Technical Issues and Problems
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 12:44 am
Thought the board may need a place for reporting technical problems.
Quite right. Thanks.
Quite right. Thanks.
Another day in the Universe
https://www.onthenatureofthings.net/forum/
https://www.onthenatureofthings.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=32
Quite right. Thanks.monster_gardener wrote:Thought the board may need a place for reporting technical problems.
Odd. Sorry about that. No idea why at the moment.monster_gardener wrote:Minor technical problem:
Post at :
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=22#p104
Lists Endovelico as author of the post but, monster_gardener is the author........
As I didn't know how to link to that particular thread, I copied it and reposted, preserving the name of the original poster. However it showed me, as it must, as the originator. Sorry about that, but it was well meant...monster_gardener wrote:Minor technical problem:
Post at :
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=22#p104
Lists Endovelico as author of the post but, monster_gardener is the author........
Thank you very much for your explanation, Endovelico.Endovelico wrote:As I didn't know how to link to that particular thread, I copied it and reposted, preserving the name of the original poster. However it showed me, as it must, as the originator. Sorry about that, but it was well meant...monster_gardener wrote:Minor technical problem:
Post at :
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=22#p104
Lists Endovelico as author of the post but, monster_gardener is the author........
Thanks for explaining how this happened.Endovelico wrote:As I didn't know how to link to that particular thread, I copied it and reposted, preserving the name of the original poster. However it showed me, as it must, as the originator. Sorry about that, but it was well meant...monster_gardener wrote:Minor technical problem:
Post at :
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=22#p104
Lists Endovelico as author of the post but, monster_gardener is the author........
Good point. Reset to 30 posts per page as an experiment. Poster feedback on the number would be appreciated.Enki wrote:I think forums read better if you can have more posts per page. 25 posts per page is a good number. I can even deal with 50, but some might not be into that.
Quite right. Have scaled back to 20 posts per page. Seems to be okay.Miss_Faucie_Fishtits wrote:If everybody posts a graphic or video per post, thirty might be a bit on low buffer settings......'>......
Ah.Sparky wrote:I think our scaly breasted chum is referring to slow internet access or low spec hardware at the client end, rather than anything to do with the forum or the rate it is dished out by the hosting server.
Most browsers will let you turn off flash and images, or have plugins that allow you to load such content on demand rather than by default.
If you would again please try making a new post and see if you have the "Edit" button.monster_gardener wrote:Logging out and back on appears to have little or no effect.
Can edit the last post in Current Events: Gadaffy's Daughter, test post.
Can edit some of the posts in this thread: the most recent ones:
First editable post is : viewtopic.php?f=15&t=32#p431
Can not edit any post of mine in American politics.
Hope this testing helps..........
admin wrote:If you would again please try making a new post and see if you have the "Edit" button.monster_gardener wrote:Logging out and back on appears to have little or no effect.
Can edit the last post in Current Events: Gadaffy's Daughter, test post.
Can edit some of the posts in this thread: the most recent ones:
First editable post is : viewtopic.php?f=15&t=32#p431
Can not edit any post of mine in American politics.
Hope this testing helps..........
Question: should we set a time limit on editing posts?
IMVHO probably not. I frequently go back to correct typos or tweak a meaning.Question: should we set a time limit on editing posts?
It was 25 at Diegetics.Miss_Faucie_Fishtits wrote:If everybody posts a graphic or video per post, thirty might be a bit on low buffer settings......'>......
Thanks for the info.Enki wrote:It was 25 at Diegetics.Miss_Faucie_Fishtits wrote:If everybody posts a graphic or video per post, thirty might be a bit on low buffer settings......'>......