If you're trying to argue that consumer boycotts are somehow equivalent to businesses discriminating against customers without a reasonable basis, you'll have to write something coherent.Doc wrote:So when you say that if conservatives don't like left wing companies like Twitter or Facebook because they treat people equally they should make their own "Twitter" or "Facebook"you really didn't mean it?Zack Morris wrote:Economic freedom comes with responsibility. The private sector is supplies most of our goods and services and is an integral part of society. Businesses must treat patrons fairly and equally to prevent them from using their considerable economic leverage to discriminate against and oppress classes of people without justifiable cause. Discriminating against customers on the basis of sexual orientation is not reasonable. If someone has genuine religious objections to serving a gay customer (hard to believe, because nothing in Christian scripture prohibits this), he should not be operating a business in the first place.Doc wrote:While the dems have been busy trying to put their boots on the throats of every one that disagrees with them. You still haven't given a reason why bakers have to bake cakes for ceremonies that they sincerely believe is against their religious beliefs.Zack Morris wrote:The Democratic party has hit low water marks before. The GOP got damn lucky with gerrymandering, empty populism, and a national political structure that tilts too much political power toward otherwise weak and inconsequential, homogeneous states. This is just a temporary set back. We're never going back to pre-New Deal America. We're not even going back to the 50's. With Donald Trump at the helm, the GOP is only going to accelerate its customary cyclical implosion.Mr. Perfect wrote:Speaking of crazy, your party is at its lowest levels since the civil war and to deal with it you put on genital costumes and riot and have public meltdowns that shock Americans.
You are never coming back.
The future of the GOP
- Zack Morris
- Posts: 2837
- Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2011 8:52 am
- Location: Bayside High School
Re: The future of the GOP
Re: The future of the GOP
No you said when I mention that Twitter or Facebook( I don't remember which) wasn't being even handed Left VS Right you said people on the right should start their own service. That it was in effect "leftists only" Those a big tech businesses yet you are fine with them discriminating But when it comes to a small mom and pop you have a problem with it. Sounds more like enemies to be eradicated with you.Zack Morris wrote:If you're trying to argue that consumer boycotts are somehow equivalent to businesses discriminating against customers without a reasonable basis, you'll have to write something coherent.Doc wrote:So when you say that if conservatives don't like left wing companies like Twitter or Facebook because they treat people equally they should make their own "Twitter" or "Facebook"you really didn't mean it?Zack Morris wrote:Economic freedom comes with responsibility. The private sector is supplies most of our goods and services and is an integral part of society. Businesses must treat patrons fairly and equally to prevent them from using their considerable economic leverage to discriminate against and oppress classes of people without justifiable cause. Discriminating against customers on the basis of sexual orientation is not reasonable. If someone has genuine religious objections to serving a gay customer (hard to believe, because nothing in Christian scripture prohibits this), he should not be operating a business in the first place.Doc wrote:While the dems have been busy trying to put their boots on the throats of every one that disagrees with them. You still haven't given a reason why bakers have to bake cakes for ceremonies that they sincerely believe is against their religious beliefs.Zack Morris wrote:The Democratic party has hit low water marks before. The GOP got damn lucky with gerrymandering, empty populism, and a national political structure that tilts too much political power toward otherwise weak and inconsequential, homogeneous states. This is just a temporary set back. We're never going back to pre-New Deal America. We're not even going back to the 50's. With Donald Trump at the helm, the GOP is only going to accelerate its customary cyclical implosion.Mr. Perfect wrote:Speaking of crazy, your party is at its lowest levels since the civil war and to deal with it you put on genital costumes and riot and have public meltdowns that shock Americans.
You are never coming back.
Get a clue
http://www.npr.org/2017/03/28/521118179 ... ems-solved
"I fancied myself as some kind of god....It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.” -- George Soros
-
- Posts: 16973
- Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:35 am
- Heracleum Persicum
- Posts: 11574
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:38 pm
Re: The future of the GOP
.
Agree, Donald should take Paul Ryan with him .. and switch off the light
.
Mr. Perfect wrote:Paul Ryan has to go.
Agree, Donald should take Paul Ryan with him .. and switch off the light
.
-
- Posts: 16973
- Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:35 am
Re: The future of the GOP
What are you going to do when Trump is elected to a 2nd term.
Censorship isn't necessary
- Heracleum Persicum
- Posts: 11574
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:38 pm
Re: The future of the GOP
.
MP, not sure things will come to that .. Trump saying a nuclear war with North Korea can start any moment.
And
FYI, China said today China would not tolerate any move against North Korea
Meaning, any move against North Korea same as war with China (and Russia)
.
Mr. Perfect wrote:What are you going to do when Trump is elected to a 2nd term.
MP, not sure things will come to that .. Trump saying a nuclear war with North Korea can start any moment.
And
FYI, China said today China would not tolerate any move against North Korea
Meaning, any move against North Korea same as war with China (and Russia)
.
-
- Posts: 16973
- Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:35 am
Re: The future of the GOP
Looks like you are in the fake news again. Trump will win North Korea easily, approval rating will go to 90%.
Censorship isn't necessary
- Zack Morris
- Posts: 2837
- Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2011 8:52 am
- Location: Bayside High School
Re: The future of the GOP
So far, Kim Jong Un is winning decisively. Trump floated the idea of a face-to-face meeting. WEAK. And now South Korea has a dovish administration. Action against North Korea will lead to massive South Korean civilian casualties and American losses on a scale not seen for decades. The latter alone will be enough to enrage the American public given that an incompetent trust-fund reality star signed their death warrants.Mr. Perfect wrote:Looks like you are in the fake news again. Trump will win North Korea easily, approval rating will go to 90%.
-
- Posts: 16973
- Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:35 am
Re: The future of the GOP
I've never questioned why you are in the superminority.
Censorship isn't necessary
-
- Posts: 16973
- Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:35 am
Re: The future of the GOP
Check these out bro. Let me know how they make you feel.
Mr. Perfect wrote:Mr. Perfect wrote:Lol, You thinking of obama, he destroyed his own party. Set record for loss.
obama less popular than W Bush, R Nixon can't stop laughing
After record media promotion. Unbelievable. Americans say, obama worst President in history.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/26130 ... greenfield
More Americans consider Barack Obama to be the worst President since World War II than they do any other president, according to a new poll.
The Quinnipiac poll out Wednesday found that 33% of Americans see Obama as the worst post-war president, while just 8% consider him the best. Another 28% see former President George W. Bush as the worst. Richard Nixon, the only American President ever to resign in disgrace, was picked the worst by 13%, according to the poll.
Censorship isn't necessary