The U.K.

User avatar
NapLajoieonSteroids
Posts: 8424
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 7:04 pm

Re: The U.K.

Post by NapLajoieonSteroids »

Ymix confirmed: 5 year olds in charge of the European Union. The fate of their unity depends on the timing of when their mothers call'em home for supper.
Simple Minded

Re: The U.K.

Post by Simple Minded »

YMix wrote:
EU foreign ministers canceled an informal dinner planned for Sunday night at which they expected to discuss Brexit, saying it would be “inappropriate” after the terror attack in Nice.

Diplomats said some ministers were opposed to talking about the U.K.’s departure from the EU in the presence of its controversial new foreign secretary, Boris Johnson — whose surprise appointment this week drew scorn from his French and German counterparts.

[...]

“The desire of the entire 27 countries to do something with the Brits was frankly not very strong,” said a European diplomat. The source said several ministers felt the meeting was “a very bad idea.”

[...]

Another diplomat said the meeting was canceled because Mogherini did not “have the mandate to talk about Brexit.” The source added that EU leaders are planning to discuss British exit from the EU at an informal gathering in Bratislava on September 16.
Cancelling scheduled meetings to discuss things that are beyond your control, when you have no idea what to do about anything is always progress. I'm optimistic.
User avatar
Alexis
Posts: 1305
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:47 pm

Anozer day as der leader of EU

Post by Alexis »

:lol: ...

(and not so off the mark)

Image
Simple Minded

Re: The U.K.

Post by Simple Minded »

:lol: think I get it, and I don't even speak EUropean.
User avatar
Torchwood
Posts: 496
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 12:01 am

Re: The U.K.

Post by Torchwood »

Sorry to puncture your fantasies, but support for the EU has surged in member states since the awful mess for the UK caused by Brexit has sunk in.

http://uk.mobile.reuters.com/article/idUKKCN1002A0
Mr. Perfect
Posts: 16973
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:35 am

Re: The U.K.

Post by Mr. Perfect »

Speaking of punctured fantasies, Pat Condell on British Independence. Amazing, that even now, EUers refuse to respond to the most basic exit arguments.

THWPJE4xaJM
Censorship isn't necessary
User avatar
Parodite
Posts: 5673
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:43 pm

Re: The U.K.

Post by Parodite »

Torchwood wrote:Sorry to puncture your fantasies, but support for the EU has surged in member states since the awful mess for the UK caused by Brexit has sunk in.

http://uk.mobile.reuters.com/article/idUKKCN1002A0
Not too suprising. Morons and willing executioners abound.
Deep down I'm very superficial
User avatar
YMix
Posts: 4631
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 4:53 am
Location: Department of Congruity - Report any outliers here

Re: The U.K.

Post by YMix »

PETER HITCHENS: Want to see who started the Iraq War? Look in the mirror

Oh, for goodness’ sake leave the pathetic Blair creature alone. He will never understand what he did and probably didn’t understand it at the time. He isn’t very bright and now lives a lonely, meaningless life of empty speeches delivered to bored businessmen in return for money, which will have to be penance enough. If you want to blame anyone for the Iraq disaster, look at yourselves. I opposed it at the time, and remember how few others did. I don’t really count the Leftist demonstrators, who oppose all wars, just or unjust.

I mean the great mass of patriotic Middle Britain, normal decent people, who were so willingly misled. I mean those scores of MPs of both parties who scuttled, bleating, through the war lobby and now claim, falsely, that they didn’t know the facts. I mean my media colleagues, who have been trained from their earliest years to doubt what they are told, yet swallowed Alastair Campbell’s great dish of steaming tripe without a thought. Come on, how hard was it to see that the danger was invented, that the war was illegal and that it was none of our business? I have no prophetic powers but I could see it.

And yet, diddled so blatantly that even an official report now confirms it, you still don’t learn. How many supposedly responsible voters are currently being fooled by today’s attempt to spin us into a stupid conflict with Russia, a country almost nobody in Whitehall knows anything about or understands? At least as many as were misled by claims of a fictional massacre into supporting the Libya disaster. At least as many as were persuaded by a media chorus to admire Hilary Benn’s feeble, poorly argued speech urging us to bomb Syria.

Is there no idiocy you can’t be gulled into by a bit of atrocity propaganda or the endlessly recycled claim that the chosen target is the new Hitler, who must not be ‘appeased’? A word of advice: if you don’t like atrocities, don’t start wars. Wars are the mother and father of atrocities, and one day they will come home to us, if we keep launching them against others. Vladimir Putin is already being turned into the new Hitler. Nobody who knows anything about Russia thinks this is true. But a couple of weeks ago we more or less secretly sent British troops to Ukraine, a country with which we are not in any way allied, and which is a war zone. Was Parliament asked about ‘Exercise Rapid Trident’? I can find no record of it.

We have just made the daft decision to send 650 scarce troops to Poland and Estonia. This is supposedly in response to a ‘Russian threat’ to these countries for which there is no actual evidence. Apart from the tiny exclave of Kaliningrad, Poland doesn’t even have a border with Russia. As the wise academic Professor Richard Sakwa, whose father served in the pre-war Polish Army, has rightly said: ‘Nato grew to meet the threat it had itself provoked.’ If we are not careful, we shall once again create a war out of our own exaggerated fears and by believing our own propaganda. Any of you who are taken in by this have no right to attack Mr Blair. You are as bad as he is. He and his like couldn’t do what they do without your help.
“There are a lot of killers. We’ve got a lot of killers. What, do you think our country’s so innocent? Take a look at what we’ve done, too.” - Donald J. Trump, President of the USA
The Kushner sh*t is greasy - Stevie B.
User avatar
Heracleum Persicum
Posts: 11624
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:38 pm

Re: The Donald....the newest savior.....

Post by Heracleum Persicum »

User avatar
Alexis
Posts: 1305
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:47 pm

Re: The Donald....the newest savior.....

Post by Alexis »

Heracleum Persicum wrote:sooooo funny :lol:
What's so funny about that:
Ms May was challenged by the SNP’s George Kerevan, who asked: "Are you prepared to authorise a nuclear strike that could kill hundreds of thousands of men, women and children?”

Ms May replied with one word: “Yes.”
And what's so surprising, by the way?



Incidentally, you posted in the wrong thread in the wrong subforum. The thread "UK" is located in the "Europe" subforum. :)

This being related to the fact that Britain - believe it or not - is not in Northern America :mrgreen:
Simple Minded

Re: The Donald....the newest savior.....

Post by Simple Minded »

Alexis wrote:
This being related to the fact that Britain - believe it or not - is not in Northern America :mrgreen:
True, its not located over here. But the French wish is was, don't they? ;)
User avatar
Alexis
Posts: 1305
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:47 pm

Re: The Donald....the newest savior.....

Post by Alexis »

Simple Minded wrote:
Alexis wrote:This being related to the fact that Britain - believe it or not - is not in Northern America :mrgreen:
True, its not located over here. But the French wish is was, don't they? ;)
That's an urban legend and nothing more.

In reality, we in France know and apply the principle: "Keep Your Friends Close, But Your Enemies Closer" :mrgreen: :P
User avatar
YMix
Posts: 4631
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 4:53 am
Location: Department of Congruity - Report any outliers here

Re: The U.K.

Post by YMix »

Greater Manchester Assistant Chief Constable Rebekah Sutcliffe was suspended in May after she allegedly 'flashed' Superintendent Sarah Jackson. ACC Sutcliffe, who earns £109,000-a-year and is off work on full pay, reportedly argued that the breast enhancement surgery undergone by Supt Jackson was 'pandering' to men.
Cat fight!
“There are a lot of killers. We’ve got a lot of killers. What, do you think our country’s so innocent? Take a look at what we’ve done, too.” - Donald J. Trump, President of the USA
The Kushner sh*t is greasy - Stevie B.
User avatar
Nonc Hilaire
Posts: 6200
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 1:28 am

Re: The U.K.

Post by Nonc Hilaire »

YMix wrote:
Greater Manchester Assistant Chief Constable Rebekah Sutcliffe was suspended in May after she allegedly 'flashed' Superintendent Sarah Jackson. ACC Sutcliffe, who earns £109,000-a-year and is off work on full pay, reportedly argued that the breast enhancement surgery undergone by Supt Jackson was 'pandering' to men.
Cat fight!
Sounds like Jackson was the Greater Man Chester.
“Christ has no body now but yours. Yours are the eyes through which he looks with compassion on this world. Yours are the feet with which he walks among His people to do good. Yours are the hands through which he blesses His creation.”

Teresa of Ávila
User avatar
YMix
Posts: 4631
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 4:53 am
Location: Department of Congruity - Report any outliers here

Re: The U.K.

Post by YMix »

Sutcliffe just wanted to get some things off her chest.
“There are a lot of killers. We’ve got a lot of killers. What, do you think our country’s so innocent? Take a look at what we’ve done, too.” - Donald J. Trump, President of the USA
The Kushner sh*t is greasy - Stevie B.
User avatar
Nonc Hilaire
Posts: 6200
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 1:28 am

Brexit aftermath

Post by Nonc Hilaire »

z8rYotiiFP8
“Christ has no body now but yours. Yours are the eyes through which he looks with compassion on this world. Yours are the feet with which he walks among His people to do good. Yours are the hands through which he blesses His creation.”

Teresa of Ávila
User avatar
Typhoon
Posts: 27399
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:42 pm
Location: 関西

Re: Brexit aftermath

Post by Typhoon »

Nonc Hilaire wrote:z8rYotiiFP8
:lol:

Indeed.

Reuters | British economy escapes Brexit blow, for now

[I'm a big fan of Looney Tunes and Marvin the Martian.]
May the gods preserve and defend me from self-righteous altruists; I can defend myself from my enemies and my friends.
User avatar
Heracleum Persicum
Posts: 11624
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:38 pm

Re: The Donald....the newest savior.....

Post by Heracleum Persicum »

Alexis wrote:
Heracleum Persicum wrote:sooooo funny :lol:
What's so funny about that:
Ms May was challenged by the SNP’s George Kerevan, who asked: "Are you prepared to authorise a nuclear strike that could kill hundreds of thousands of men, women and children?”

Ms May replied with one word: “Yes.”
And what's so surprising, by the way?



Incidentally, you posted in the wrong thread in the wrong subforum. The thread "UK" is located in the "Europe" subforum. :)

This being related to the fact that Britain - believe it or not - is not in Northern America :mrgreen:

.

Alexis , this not about British internal or even British foreign policy .. not even about Britain

Morgenland feels validated (mad mullahs saying West thinkin this way, some would not believe) .. Basically, West (Morgenland does not differentiate between Brits and Americans and French etc .. all same mindset) ready to drop a nuclear bomb on innocent people, killing 100s of 1000s of woman and children, if Western "interest" in danger .. this a "moral" issue .. in that sense, ME too should prepare for such world.

That brings us back to "Trump" thread .. as next American presidential election in reality a Brexit style "Referendum" .. Hillary a war monger, she voted YES attacking Iraq, pushed for bombing Syria and no fly zone (Obama said no), was the key for attacking Libya etc etc .. Trump, apparently , saying lets pack and leave


.
User avatar
Typhoon
Posts: 27399
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:42 pm
Location: 関西

Re: Brexit aftermath

Post by Typhoon »

Nonc Hilaire wrote:z8rYotiiFP8
Grauniad | The post-referendum economy: data defies gloomy UK predictions
Fears that Britain will slide into a post-referendum recession have been allayed after a Guardian analysis showed the latest news on the economy has confounded analysts’ gloomy expectations, with consumer spending strong, unemployment low and the housing market holding steady.
The track record of experts in predicting the future is no better than that of the local fortune teller.
May the gods preserve and defend me from self-righteous altruists; I can defend myself from my enemies and my friends.
Mr. Perfect
Posts: 16973
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:35 am

Re: The U.K.

Post by Mr. Perfect »

Wow, UK economy is getting hammered over brexit.
Censorship isn't necessary
User avatar
YMix
Posts: 4631
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 4:53 am
Location: Department of Congruity - Report any outliers here

Re: The U.K.

Post by YMix »

In post-Brexit GB, the people have spoken and globalism is on the run.
The UK has just passed a massive expansion in surveillance powers, which critics have called "terrifying" and "dangerous".

[...]

The law will force internet providers to record every internet customer's top-level web history in real-time for up to a year, which can be accessed by numerous government departments; force companies to decrypt data on demand -- though the government has never been that clear on exactly how it forces foreign firms to do that that; and even disclose any new security features in products before they launch.

Not only that, the law also gives the intelligence agencies the power to hack into computers and devices of citizens (known as equipment interference), although some protected professions -- such as journalists and medical staff -- are layered with marginally better protections.

In other words, it's the "most extreme surveillance law ever passed in a democracy," according to Jim Killock, director of the Open Rights Group.

The bill was opposed by representatives of the United Nations, all major UK and many leading global privacy and rights groups, and a host of Silicon Valley tech companies alike. Even the parliamentary committee tasked with scrutinizing the bill called some of its provisions "vague".
Or not.
“There are a lot of killers. We’ve got a lot of killers. What, do you think our country’s so innocent? Take a look at what we’ve done, too.” - Donald J. Trump, President of the USA
The Kushner sh*t is greasy - Stevie B.
noddy
Posts: 11337
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 3:09 pm

Re: The U.K.

Post by noddy »

YMix wrote:
The UK has just passed a massive expansion in surveillance powers, which critics have called "terrifying" and "dangerous".

[...]

The law will force internet providers to record every internet customer's top-level web history in real-time for up to a year, which can be accessed by numerous government departments; force companies to decrypt data on demand -- though the government has never been that clear on exactly how it forces foreign firms to do that that; and even disclose any new security features in products before they launch.

Not only that, the law also gives the intelligence agencies the power to hack into computers and devices of citizens (known as equipment interference), although some protected professions -- such as journalists and medical staff -- are layered with marginally better protections.

In other words, it's the "most extreme surveillance law ever passed in a democracy," according to Jim Killock, director of the Open Rights Group.

The bill was opposed by representatives of the United Nations, all major UK and many leading global privacy and rights groups, and a host of Silicon Valley tech companies alike. Even the parliamentary committee tasked with scrutinizing the bill called some of its provisions "vague".
.
Its always refreshing when your most cynical doomer porn moments isnt actualy paranoid enough.

the thing im most fearful of isnt totalitarian government in the grand sense, its petty officials who have personality clashes with 'people like me'
ultracrepidarian
manolo
Posts: 1582
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 4:46 pm

Nanny state on booze

Post by manolo »

Hi,

The chief medical officer of the UK Tory government has cut recommended alcohol limits for men. This was 21 units per week and was reduced (earlier this year) to 14 units per week. Why? Other European countries are far more liberal, with recommendations in most countries ranging from 21 units to 31 units per week. Why do we get the nanny state?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38466507

A sinister development is the medical officer's recent remarks on the similarity between alcohol and smoking. She says, “This plan is a great start. This is a journey. Look at tobacco.” What journey is she talking about? Prohibition?

I don't know how other people feel, but I'm sick of the nanny state telling me what I can and cannot do with my own money.

Alex. :shock:
User avatar
YMix
Posts: 4631
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 4:53 am
Location: Department of Congruity - Report any outliers here

Re: The U.K.

Post by YMix »

Move to France. :)
“There are a lot of killers. We’ve got a lot of killers. What, do you think our country’s so innocent? Take a look at what we’ve done, too.” - Donald J. Trump, President of the USA
The Kushner sh*t is greasy - Stevie B.
Simple Minded

Re: Nanny state on booze

Post by Simple Minded »

manolo wrote:Hi,

The chief medical officer of the UK Tory government has cut recommended alcohol limits for men. This was 21 units per week and was reduced (earlier this year) to 14 units per week. Why? Other European countries are far more liberal, with recommendations in most countries ranging from 21 units to 31 units per week. Why do we get the nanny state?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38466507

A sinister development is the medical officer's recent remarks on the similarity between alcohol and smoking. She says, “This plan is a great start. This is a journey. Look at tobacco.” What journey is she talking about? Prohibition?

I don't know how other people feel, but I'm sick of the nanny state telling me what I can and cannot do with my own money.

Alex. :shock:
Welcome back Alex. When you want someone else to pay for your lifestyle needs, you got to expect their input.

Example, one of my Obama worshipping friends is very overweight and drinks like a fish. He wants others to pay for his healthcare, but thinks that other's expectations that he attain and maintain a healthy weight and healthy lifestyle are intrusions on his freedom. Oddly enough, he does not think that his siphoning off their financial resources is an intrusion on their freedom. :?

Humans..... rational thought is definitely not one of their strong suits. As they say in the colonies, "You made that bed, now lay in it!"

Cheers.
Post Reply