France

User avatar
Heracleum Persicum
Posts: 11574
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:38 pm

Re: France

Post by Heracleum Persicum »

Typhoon wrote:.

The fear of women and the perception that sex is somehow unclean is hardly unique to Islam.

.

Where do you have this from ? ?

Islam promotes sex .. and .. # 1 duty of any wife is to give pleasure to the husband .. In Islam, Sex, explicitly, is promoted, not to make children but to'"enjoy".

Nor, Islam says woman are unclean .. no such thing .. and .. mad mullahs, explicitly, on TV, say BlowJob and aural sex is good (hallal) .. in fact, watched head of Iranian sex education, an Ayatollah, on TV, saying swallowing after BJ is good and kosher, pretty much everything between a man and woman is promoted, no limit.

Now, mad mullahs have SEX education for new weds .. mostly posted on uTube .. very interesting, funny, extremely explicit and sexy .. first could not believe my eyes and ears what the Ayatollah was saying on TV.

.
Simple Minded

Re: France

Post by Simple Minded »

Heracleum Persicum wrote:
Typhoon wrote:.

The fear of women and the perception that sex is somehow unclean is hardly unique to Islam.

.

Where do you have this from ? ?

Islam promotes sex .. and .. # 1 duty of any wife is to give pleasure to the husband .. In Islam, Sex, explicitly, is promoted, not to make children but to'"enjoy".

Nor, Islam says woman are unclean .. no such thing .. and .. mad mullahs, explicitly, on TV, say BlowJob and aural sex is good (hallal) .. in fact, watched head of Iranian sex education, an Ayatollah, on TV, saying swallowing after BJ is good and kosher, pretty much everything between a man and woman is promoted, no limit.

Now, mad mullahs have SEX education for new weds .. mostly posted on uTube .. very interesting, funny, extremely explicit and sexy .. first could not believe my eyes and ears what the Ayatollah was saying on TV.

.
Additional data point that no two people ever climb the same mountain.
Mr. Perfect
Posts: 16973
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:35 am

Re: France

Post by Mr. Perfect »

Parodite wrote:
Mr. Perfect wrote:How are Christians harming Europe.
How are you not reading my post. But now that you ask...a good question. Will think about it.

Did some thinking: Christians tend to be too busy with other concerns. Valuable time lost that could have been spent more wisely.
That's it?
Censorship isn't necessary
Mr. Perfect
Posts: 16973
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:35 am

Re: France

Post by Mr. Perfect »

Also, Nice gunman had accomplices, long term planning according to current evidence.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/france-truck ... tml?ref=gs
Five suspects have been formally charged over the July 14 truck attack in the French Riveria city that killed 84 people.

Investigators initially said Bouhlel appeared to have undergone a lightning-quick radicalisation but the picture emerging is of a long-planned attack.

The prosecutor said Thursday that photos on his phone showed he had already staked out the same July 14 event in Nice a year ago.

Acquaintances of the father of three, who had been living in the city for around a decade, said he had shown little interest in religion and was prone to violence.

But the probe has revealed a fascination with jihad dating back at least a year.
Censorship isn't necessary
User avatar
Parodite
Posts: 5643
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:43 pm

Re: France

Post by Parodite »

Mr. Perfect wrote:
Parodite wrote:
Mr. Perfect wrote:How are Christians harming Europe.
How are you not reading my post. But now that you ask...a good question. Will think about it.

Did some thinking: Christians tend to be too busy with other concerns. Valuable time lost that could have been spent more wisely.
That's it?
Yes, that's it. Christianity, like all long standing traditions that have voodoo meta-physics at the core of their group-psyche, calibrate and synchronize people into a psychotic delusional ground state. This has a price though, it always has.

For instance in the West constitutionally and morally a person is free to be in a psychotic-delusional state alone or together with others in various houses of worship where those psychotic delusions are nurtured. A fair enough right but it causes the culture as a whole to more easily turn a blind eye to violent excesses that spring from the psychotic-delusional market place; they want to white-wash the acts of violence from any "religious causes".

Religion after all is not supposed to be a major cause of violent excesses. That way (socialist post-) Christians are complicit in the refugee problem here in Europe... by simply being good intended but naive morons. And the messianic vision of a Unified One Europe of course jives very well with the biblical new world promised where everybody will be One with the One.

These voodoo-fibers linger on to infest and complicate matters here on this continent. Most of your hated left wing liberals are post-Christian orphans who really mean well but create a mess instead. They are easy canon fodder for the oligarchy.
Deep down I'm very superficial
Mr. Perfect
Posts: 16973
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:35 am

Re: France

Post by Mr. Perfect »

I dunno. Europeans take a whole month of vacation, hard to see how you complain about anyone wasting their time.
Censorship isn't necessary
Mr. Perfect
Posts: 16973
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:35 am

Re: France

Post by Mr. Perfect »

And entertaining to watch you blame atheist behavior on Christians. You'll have your hands full with that one.
Censorship isn't necessary
User avatar
Parodite
Posts: 5643
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:43 pm

Re: France

Post by Parodite »

Mr. Perfect wrote:And entertaining to watch you blame atheist behavior on Christians. You'll have your hands full with that one.
:) Not that difficult. All addictions have withdrawal symptoms.

Atheists who were raised in a religious environment tend to be somewhat overly angry and frustrated; there you have the militant atheist.

Or they may have abandoned core tenets of religious delusional dogma but still operate emotionally, socially and politically in a similar way; messianic dreaming about an egalitarian society where everybody is Equal and One.

The downside of Equal and One is that you, the unique individual, become nobody and disappear. Like the Christian cannot win but by faith and divine help from outside, so the socialist post-Christian cannot win and survive but by the State. A debilitating fear of death and inability to take full responsibility will always guide the Christian and post-Christian socialist.

The question of blame is not relevant here; it's a chicken or egg thing. I just look at the mechanics of things, it is interesting.
Deep down I'm very superficial
Mr. Perfect
Posts: 16973
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:35 am

Re: France

Post by Mr. Perfect »

I meant to say you'll have your hands full explaining to post Christians that their behavior is because of Christianity. They will not like that.
Censorship isn't necessary
User avatar
Alexis
Posts: 1305
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:47 pm

Jihad latest - Rouen, France, July 26th 2016

Post by Alexis »

A Catholic priest was murdered and several other persons wounded by blade weapons in a hostage situation following attack on a church in a small city near Rouen, France. The two attackers were killed by police forces.

The attack has been claimed by the Islamic State.

The previous Minister of Justice, until beginning of this year, Christiane Taubira, changed penal policy so as to put far more people out of jail. Prison time was replaced with "jail at home" with restriction of movement. That policy has been sharply criticized both by the oppositions and by police representatives.

Now it so happens that one of the attackers who killed that priest and wounded severely several other persons was under such a "jail at home" penalty. Had Hollande not allowed his previous Minister of Justice to apply such a stupid reform, this guy would have been in prison now.

There will be political hell to pay. :x
Mr. Perfect
Posts: 16973
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:35 am

Re: France

Post by Mr. Perfect »

Probably not.
Censorship isn't necessary
User avatar
Parodite
Posts: 5643
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:43 pm

Re: France

Post by Parodite »

Mr. Perfect wrote:I meant to say you'll have your hands full explaining to post Christians that their behavior is because of Christianity. They will not like that.
Maybe. I'm not in the business of singular cause explanations though. However, yes. Religion, or its cultural aftermath in secularizing societies, is a great causal force among others. My point is that it tends to be downplayed, ignored or downright judged not-guilty of anything. Denial.
Deep down I'm very superficial
User avatar
Alexis
Posts: 1305
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:47 pm

Re: France

Post by Alexis »

Mr. Perfect wrote:Probably not.
I mean our presidential and parlementarian elections, which will take place in Spring 2017.
Mr. Perfect
Posts: 16973
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:35 am

Re: France

Post by Mr. Perfect »

My assessment is that nothing will change for your country.
Censorship isn't necessary
User avatar
Typhoon
Posts: 27267
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:42 pm
Location: 関西

Re: France

Post by Typhoon »

Grauniad | French police make woman remove clothing on Nice beach following burkini ban
Authorities in 15 towns have banned burkinis, citing public concern following recent terrorist attacks in the country
Unless there is some aspect of human nature that I completely missing,
this strikes me as a too dumb for words response to the recent terrible attacks.
May the gods preserve and defend me from self-righteous altruists; I can defend myself from my enemies and my friends.
User avatar
Nonc Hilaire
Posts: 6170
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 1:28 am

Re: France

Post by Nonc Hilaire »

Typhoon wrote:Grauniad | French police make woman remove clothing on Nice beach following burkini ban
Authorities in 15 towns have banned burkinis, citing public concern following recent terrorist attacks in the country
Unless there is some aspect of human nature that I completely missing,
this strikes me as a too dumb for words response to the recent terrible attacks.
Yes. If we can have nude beaches we can have burkini beaches.
“Christ has no body now but yours. Yours are the eyes through which he looks with compassion on this world. Yours are the feet with which he walks among His people to do good. Yours are the hands through which he blesses His creation.”

Teresa of Ávila
noddy
Posts: 11326
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 3:09 pm

Re: France

Post by noddy »

as a moderate centrist i propose a common sense compromise.

eye candy should go nude, fat ugly types must be in burkahs.
ultracrepidarian
User avatar
YMix
Posts: 4631
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 4:53 am
Location: Department of Congruity - Report any outliers here

Re: France

Post by YMix »

noddy wrote:as a moderate centrist i propose a common sense compromise.

eye candy should go nude, fat ugly types must be in burkahs.
That's a sensible solution. However, one man's fat ugly type is another man's BBW. Where do we draw the line?
“There are a lot of killers. We’ve got a lot of killers. What, do you think our country’s so innocent? Take a look at what we’ve done, too.” - Donald J. Trump, President of the USA
The Kushner sh*t is greasy - Stevie B.
User avatar
Nonc Hilaire
Posts: 6170
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 1:28 am

Re: France

Post by Nonc Hilaire »

noddy wrote:as a moderate centrist i propose a common sense compromise.

eye candy should go nude, fat ugly types must be in burkahs.
Hey! I don't want to wear a burkah!
“Christ has no body now but yours. Yours are the eyes through which he looks with compassion on this world. Yours are the feet with which he walks among His people to do good. Yours are the hands through which he blesses His creation.”

Teresa of Ávila
User avatar
Heracleum Persicum
Posts: 11574
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:38 pm

Re: France

Post by Heracleum Persicum »

noddy wrote:.

eye candy should go nude, fat ugly types must be in burkahs.

.

Beautiful girls do not go naked on the beach , "that thing" for them money in the bank, why give it for free ? ? ?

and

All this Burkini stuff in "South of France" tourist centre municipalities just publicity stunts to get on world nightly news , as Hotels and Restaurants empty, business bad .. no Burkini ban in Marseille or other places with majority Arab population but is ShiShi Cannes ? ? :lol:

.
Simple Minded

Re: France

Post by Simple Minded »

Nonc Hilaire wrote:
noddy wrote:as a moderate centrist i propose a common sense compromise.

eye candy should go nude, fat ugly types must be in burkahs.
Hey! I don't want to wear a burkah!
Stop thinking like a selfish Rugged Individualist and start thinking like an altruist who cares about the common good and the feeling of his fellow citizens!

We beg you! ;)
User avatar
Typhoon
Posts: 27267
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:42 pm
Location: 関西

Re: France

Post by Typhoon »

Well,
if it was put to a female only vote,
then I suspect that the write-in winner would be banning men of a certain age and a certain girth from wearing micro speedos.
May the gods preserve and defend me from self-righteous altruists; I can defend myself from my enemies and my friends.
noddy
Posts: 11326
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 3:09 pm

Re: France

Post by noddy »

it would require a beach license and a rating provided by a panel of your peers, 6 male, 6 female.

middle aged men in budgie smugglers most definately require burkahing.
ultracrepidarian
User avatar
Zack Morris
Posts: 2837
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2011 8:52 am
Location: Bayside High School

Re: France

Post by Zack Morris »

How will the French police decide who to fine? Nuns? Scuba divers? Secular women who burn easily and want to enjoy the beach in a full-body swimsuit (i.e., a burkini, which is used by non-Muslims for that purpose)?

Image
User avatar
Alexis
Posts: 1305
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:47 pm

Re: France

Post by Alexis »

Typhoon wrote:Unless there is some aspect of human nature that I completely missing,
this strikes me as a too dumb for words response to the recent terrible attacks.
If it was done in hope of protecting against Jihadist attacks, it would be extremely stupid indeed.

The concern is however different: the topic of the debate is where should laïcité fully apply, meaning requirement of non-interference of religious or political ideologies. As of now, schools and administrations are places where such full application is demanded, meaning to abstain from religious display or political propaganda.

Some here would like to extend these places further, even so as to encompass all of public space. We have here the FN proposing to forbide conspicuous display of religious affiliation everywhere, except to religious personnel (priests, nuns, rabbis, imams).

I don't think it would be a good idea. However, the debate will probably continue.
Post Reply