Spenglerman rediscovers Iran , , , yet again

This too shall pass.
User avatar
Heracleum Persicum
Posts: 11567
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:38 pm

Re: Spenglerman rediscovers Iran , , , yet again

Post by Heracleum Persicum »

Ibrahim wrote:
Doc wrote:If you look back you can see that I said that if you take away the emotion Iran, Israel and Obama etc. Then he is a pretty good analyst.
What's left? Occasional essays about the objective superiority of Bach? Someone else's statistics about relative birthrates?

He was even right that Obama would be a disaster. He just over did it. But like I said he does come up with some unique observations of fact as well.
His writing on Obama is his most laughable and, I think Tinker was the first to point out, the exact point at which he jumped the shark and became a caricature of himself. As I described earlier, his immediate reaction to Obama was hysterical loathing about secret religious and political allegiances, socialist totalitarianism, and his fundamentally un-American identity. Insofar as Obama has actually been a "disaster" its had nothing to do with anything Spengler predicted. Obama turned out to be a typical Washington operator, almost exactly like the previous administration. But Spengler, like every slob with a "lyin' African" placard, can claim "they were right" because the economy didn't rebound from 2008 and website didn't work. Obama's immoral foreign policy doesn't bother Spengler either, he wants "more killing please," as long as the victims are the right religion/color.

.


Bravo

seconded


.
User avatar
Doc
Posts: 12562
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:10 pm

Re: Spenglerman rediscovers Iran , , , yet again

Post by Doc »

Ibrahim wrote:
Doc wrote:If you look back you can see that I said that if you take away the emotion Iran, Israel and Obama etc. Then he is a pretty good analyst.
What's left? Occasional essays about the objective superiority of Bach? Someone else's statistics about relative birthrates?
There is a great deal left for anyone that wants to see it. Even a great deal that you would probably agree with that I disagree with. For example he thought the Neo-cons were wrong early on.

He was even right that Obama would be a disaster. He just over did it. But like I said he does come up with some unique observations of fact as well.
His writing on Obama is his most laughable and, I think Tinker was the first to point out, the exact point at which he jumped the shark and became a caricature of himself. As I described earlier, his immediate reaction to Obama was hysterical loathing about secret religious and political allegiances, socialist totalitarianism, and his fundamentally un-American identity. Insofar as Obama has actually been a "disaster" its had nothing to do with anything Spengler predicted. Obama turned out to be a typical Washington operator, almost exactly like the previous administration. But Spengler, like every slob with a "lyin' African" placard, can claim "they were right" because the economy didn't rebound from 2008 and website didn't work. Obama's immoral foreign policy doesn't bother Spengler either, he wants "more killing please," as long as the victims are the right religion/color.
lyas well.
otionalabout
I initially though Obama was a good candidate. Right up until he voted for TARP. As I have absolutely no use for anyone that voted for TARP that includes McCain well. Goldman however got way too emotional about the election and what it meant for Israel. Like I said previously he is a very good analyst. But good analysts cannot get over emotional about what they are analyzing and expect to be right
"I fancied myself as some kind of god....It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.” -- George Soros
Ibrahim
Posts: 6524
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 2:06 am

Re: Spenglerman rediscovers Iran , , , yet again

Post by Ibrahim »

Doc wrote:
Ibrahim wrote:
Doc wrote:If you look back you can see that I said that if you take away the emotion Iran, Israel and Obama etc. Then he is a pretty good analyst.
What's left? Occasional essays about the objective superiority of Bach? Someone else's statistics about relative birthrates?
There is a great deal left for anyone that wants to see it. Even a great deal that you would probably agree with that I disagree with. For example he thought the Neo-cons were wrong early on.
Because of his antiquated racist view of Arabs/Muslims as "tribal" and unfit for democracy.


He was even right that Obama would be a disaster. He just over did it. But like I said he does come up with some unique observations of fact as well.
His writing on Obama is his most laughable and, I think Tinker was the first to point out, the exact point at which he jumped the shark and became a caricature of himself. As I described earlier, his immediate reaction to Obama was hysterical loathing about secret religious and political allegiances, socialist totalitarianism, and his fundamentally un-American identity. Insofar as Obama has actually been a "disaster" its had nothing to do with anything Spengler predicted. Obama turned out to be a typical Washington operator, almost exactly like the previous administration. But Spengler, like every slob with a "lyin' African" placard, can claim "they were right" because the economy didn't rebound from 2008 and website didn't work. Obama's immoral foreign policy doesn't bother Spengler either, he wants "more killing please," as long as the victims are the right religion/color.
lyas well.
otionalabout
I initially though Obama was a good candidate. Right up until he voted for TARP. As I have absolutely no use for anyone that voted for TARP that includes McCain well. Goldman however got way too emotional about the election and what it meant for Israel. Like I said previously he is a very good analyst. But good analysts cannot get over emotional about what they are analyzing and expect to be right
If Spengo's big complaint was that he was going to pass a giant stimulus package then you'd have a point. What Spengo actually wrote was that Obama " imbibed hatred of America with his mother's milk."
User avatar
Doc
Posts: 12562
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:10 pm

Re: Spenglerman rediscovers Iran , , , yet again

Post by Doc »

Ibrahim wrote:
Doc wrote:
Ibrahim wrote:
Doc wrote:If you look back you can see that I said that if you take away the emotion Iran, Israel and Obama etc. Then he is a pretty good analyst.
What's left? Occasional essays about the objective superiority of Bach? Someone else's statistics about relative birthrates?[/quot
There is a great deal left for anyone that wants to see it. Even a great deal that you would probably agree with that I disagree with. For example he thought the Neo-cons were wrong early on.
Because of his antiquated racist view of Arabs/Muslims as "tribal" and unfit for democracy.
Gee I thought only neo-cons said things like Arabs can have democracy.


He was even right that Obama would be a disaster. He just over did it. But like I said he does come up with some unique observations of fact as well.
His writing on Obama is his most laughable and, I think Tinker was the first to point out, the exact point at which he jumped the shark and became a caricature of himself. As I described earlier, his immediate reaction to Obama was hysterical loathing about secret religious and political allegiances, socialist totalitarianism, and his fundamentally un-American identity. Insofar as Obama has actually been a "disaster" its had nothing to do with anything Spengler predicted. Obama turned out to be a typical Washington operator, almost exactly like the previous administration. But Spengler, like every slob with a "lyin' African" placard, can claim "they were right" because the economy didn't rebound from 2008 and website didn't work. Obama's immoral foreign policy doesn't bother Spengler either, he wants "more killing please," as long as the victims are the right religion/color.
lyas well.
otionalabout
I initially though Obama was a good candidate. Right up until he voted for TARP. As I have absolutely no use for anyone that voted for TARP that includes McCain well. Goldman however got way too emotional about the election and what it meant for Israel. Like I said previously he is a very good analyst. But good analysts cannot get over emotional about what they are analyzing and expect to be right
If Spengo's big complaint was that he was going to pass a giant stimulus package then you'd have a point. What Spengo actually wrote was that Obama " imbibed hatred of America with his mother's milk."
Like I said emotional analysis does not work
"I fancied myself as some kind of god....It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.” -- George Soros
Ibrahim
Posts: 6524
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 2:06 am

Re: Spenglerman rediscovers Iran , , , yet again

Post by Ibrahim »

Doc wrote:
Ibrahim wrote:
Doc wrote:
Ibrahim wrote:
Doc wrote:If you look back you can see that I said that if you take away the emotion Iran, Israel and Obama etc. Then he is a pretty good analyst.
What's left? Occasional essays about the objective superiority of Bach? Someone else's statistics about relative birthrates?[/quot
There is a great deal left for anyone that wants to see it. Even a great deal that you would probably agree with that I disagree with. For example he thought the Neo-cons were wrong early on.
Because of his antiquated racist view of Arabs/Muslims as "tribal" and unfit for democracy.
Gee I thought only neo-cons said things like Arabs can have democracy.
Stupid, false comment.


He was even right that Obama would be a disaster. He just over did it. But like I said he does come up with some unique observations of fact as well.
His writing on Obama is his most laughable and, I think Tinker was the first to point out, the exact point at which he jumped the shark and became a caricature of himself. As I described earlier, his immediate reaction to Obama was hysterical loathing about secret religious and political allegiances, socialist totalitarianism, and his fundamentally un-American identity. Insofar as Obama has actually been a "disaster" its had nothing to do with anything Spengler predicted. Obama turned out to be a typical Washington operator, almost exactly like the previous administration. But Spengler, like every slob with a "lyin' African" placard, can claim "they were right" because the economy didn't rebound from 2008 and website didn't work. Obama's immoral foreign policy doesn't bother Spengler either, he wants "more killing please," as long as the victims are the right religion/color.
lyas well.
otionalabout
I initially though Obama was a good candidate. Right up until he voted for TARP. As I have absolutely no use for anyone that voted for TARP that includes McCain well. Goldman however got way too emotional about the election and what it meant for Israel. Like I said previously he is a very good analyst. But good analysts cannot get over emotional about what they are analyzing and expect to be right
If Spengo's big complaint was that he was going to pass a giant stimulus package then you'd have a point. What Spengo actually wrote was that Obama " imbibed hatred of America with his mother's milk."
Like I said emotional analysis does not work
That's why Spengler's writing is sh!t.
User avatar
Doc
Posts: 12562
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:10 pm

Re: Spenglerman rediscovers Iran , , , yet again

Post by Doc »

Ibrahim wrote:
Doc wrote:
Ibrahim wrote:
Doc wrote:
Ibrahim wrote:
Doc wrote:If you look back you can see that I said that if you take away the emotion Iran, Israel and Obama etc. Then he is a pretty good analyst.
What's left? Occasional essays about the objective superiority of Bach? Someone else's statistics about relative birthrates?[/quot
There is a great deal left for anyone that wants to see it. Even a great deal that you would probably agree with that I disagree with. For example he thought the Neo-cons were wrong early on.
Because of his antiquated racist view of Arabs/Muslims as "tribal" and unfit for democracy.
Gee I thought only neo-cons said things like Arabs can have democracy.
Stupid, false comment.
That was teh argument against trying to bring democracy to Iraq. THat Arabs were incapable of ruling themselves. I know I heard that enough times to never forget it.


He was even right that Obama would be a disaster. He just over did it. But like I said he does come up with some unique observations of fact as well.
His writing on Obama is his most laughable and, I think Tinker was the first to point out, the exact point at which he jumped the shark and became a caricature of himself. As I described earlier, his immediate reaction to Obama was hysterical loathing about secret religious and political allegiances, socialist totalitarianism, and his fundamentally un-American identity. Insofar as Obama has actually been a "disaster" its had nothing to do with anything Spengler predicted. Obama turned out to be a typical Washington operator, almost exactly like the previous administration. But Spengler, like every slob with a "lyin' African" placard, can claim "they were right" because the economy didn't rebound from 2008 and website didn't work. Obama's immoral foreign policy doesn't bother Spengler either, he wants "more killing please," as long as the victims are the right religion/color.
lyas well.
otionalabout
I initially though Obama was a good candidate. Right up until he voted for TARP. As I have absolutely no use for anyone that voted for TARP that includes McCain well. Goldman however got way too emotional about the election and what it meant for Israel. Like I said previously he is a very good analyst. But good analysts cannot get over emotional about what they are analyzing and expect to be right
If Spengo's big complaint was that he was going to pass a giant stimulus package then you'd have a point. What Spengo actually wrote was that Obama " imbibed hatred of America with his mother's milk."
Like I said emotional analysis does not work
That's why Spengler's writing is sh!t.
He wrote rather well on a large number of topics. But like I said you can't be a good anayst and be emotional at the same time. It inherently does not work
"I fancied myself as some kind of god....It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.” -- George Soros
User avatar
Miss_Faucie_Fishtits
Posts: 2150
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 9:58 pm

Re: Spenglerman rediscovers Iran , , , yet again

Post by Miss_Faucie_Fishtits »

David is basically saying that whomever you think you are, your pecker is gonna get bent. This happens to Jews as well, still, Israel has to be considered one of the handful of responsible adult nations left on earth. Those people have more say than anybody else, that's just how it works........
That's why Spengler's writing is sh!t.
I prefer shi†..... it looks more sacriligious...'>........
She irons her jeans, she's evil.........
Ibrahim
Posts: 6524
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 2:06 am

Re: Spenglerman rediscovers Iran , , , yet again

Post by Ibrahim »

Miss_Faucie_Fishtits wrote:David is basically saying that whomever you think you are, your pecker is gonna get bent. This happens to Jews as well, still, Israel has to be considered one of the handful of responsible adult nations left on earth.
Israel is a tiny apartheid state resorting to increasingly racist and violent means to secure the dominance of one ethno-religious demographic within their small and hotly contested territory. Nevertheless Spengler told me on the old forum that Jews would be around until the end of the universe, whereas other tribes were doomed. DOOOOMED!

Those people have more say than anybody else, that's just how it works........
I'm sure India is terribly impressed.


That's why Spengler's writing is sh!t.
I prefer shi†..... it looks more sacriligious...'>........
Well you don't get page hits or sell books to paranoids by playing the measured centrist.
User avatar
Heracleum Persicum
Posts: 11567
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:38 pm

Re: Spenglerman rediscovers Iran , , , yet again

Post by Heracleum Persicum »

Miss_Faucie_Fishtits wrote:.

.. Israel has to be considered one of the handful of responsible adult nations left on earth.

.

Miss FF, let's put this way, among the "BEASTS" Israel not the worst one .. True, Zionist not as bad as Nazi Germans .. concept and mindset not much different, but, times have changed, you can't skin them all

Pfui


.
noddy
Posts: 11318
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 3:09 pm

Re: Spenglerman rediscovers Iran , , , yet again

Post by noddy »

besides certain flavours of conservative jews and christians i cant think of any group that spengler was less than scathing about, he was pretty blunt about disliking progressive jews and agnostic westerners aswell.
ultracrepidarian
Ibrahim
Posts: 6524
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 2:06 am

Re: Spenglerman rediscovers Iran , , , yet again

Post by Ibrahim »

noddy wrote:he was pretty blunt about disliking progressive jews and agnostic westerners aswell.
Traitors! The stab in the back!
User avatar
Doc
Posts: 12562
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:10 pm

Re: Spenglerman rediscovers Iran , , , yet again

Post by Doc »

noddy wrote:besides certain flavours of conservative jews and christians i cant think of any group that spengler was less than scathing about, he was pretty blunt about disliking progressive jews and agnostic westerners aswell.
Considering progressive were at the fore front of the eugenics movement "progressive Jew" would seem to be a stark contradiction in terms.
"I fancied myself as some kind of god....It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.” -- George Soros
Post Reply