Re: U.S. Foreign Policy
Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2015 8:26 am
[Presumed fake until corroborated by a real news site.]Doc wrote:
Another day in the Universe
https://www.onthenatureofthings.net/forum/
https://www.onthenatureofthings.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=603
[Presumed fake until corroborated by a real news site.]Doc wrote:
Pretty sure this is true, saw POTUS lecturing us about it the other day..... then again, that's the same POTUS who thinks AGW is real....Typhoon wrote:[Presumed fake until corroborated by a real news site.]Doc wrote:
clickbait is clickbait - small struggling country towns looking for tourists or preachers trying to attract a flock can both benefit from being b4tsh1t loony and its a perfectly rational approach.Typhoon wrote:Pastor Rick Wiles | Scalia a victim of human sacrifice
Have to wonder just how alternative can one's perception of reality be and still be able to function on a day-to-day basis.
All part of Obama's planHeracleum Persicum wrote:.
Washington is destabilizing Europe “on purpose.”
.Austrian athlete and daredevil, Felix Baumgartner, known for his super-sonic leap from the stratosphere, has bashed EU politicians for their “idiotic” refugee policies in a lengthy post. He added that Washington is destabilizing Europe “on purpose.”
Senator Lindsey Graham :
The current US strategy in Iraq, Syria is failing and would empower Iran
Vaccines help eradicate many diseases throughout the world.
The production of vaccines involves growing a virus in living cells. Historically they have been manufactured by using animal cell lines that contain the Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) of that animal. Within the final product some residual living DNA remains as a contaminant in the vaccine as it cannot all be filtered out. In 1979 changes were introduced to vaccine manufacturing previously made in animal cell lines to manufacturing in human fetal cell lines. Therefore with each dose of the vaccines newly manufactured on human cells we are injecting children and adults with residual human fetal DNA and in some cases a retrovirus.
It is a well understood scientific fact that loose, living human DNA in a human can insert into the genome of that human. As the DNA in the genes govern the function of cells, such DNA insertions can seriously disrupt the function of the invaded cell. If this loose DNA invades the genes governing the function of a nerve cell in the brain, such disruption can have devastating consequences. Therefore, SCPI researches the potential health risks of the residual human DNA found in the products we use.
Many scientists have now hypothesized that cancer and other childhood neurological diseases such as autistic disorder are caused by mutations in the child’s DNA. This conclusion is based upon finding numerous mutations in the brains and/or blood of such children which cannot be found in their parents, these are called de novo mutations. They are caused by something that happens to the child after birth. SCPI researches have extensively reviewed the potential health risks posed by this residual human DNA. Based upon that research, SCPI does ongoing research and seeks to raise awareness of the potential health risks of manufacturing medical products on human cell lines.
Yes bollocks, and I would imagine ovarian cells would be involved as wellTyphoon wrote:Bollocks.
Due to the persistence of belief in Wakefield's fraud, this issue and other vaccine issues have now been studied far far more than would normally be warranted:Nonc Hilaire wrote:Yes bollocks, and I would imagine ovarian cells would be involved as wellTyphoon wrote:Bollocks.
It is a complicated question, and every vaccine needs an independent assessment but this was a new hypothesis to me. The coincidental timing of the new vaccine technology and the sudden increase in autism is a question worth researching.
None of these are on point, but the first one does conclude vaccines cause some AR's.Typhoon wrote:Due to the persistence of belief in Wakefield's fraud, this issue and other vaccine issues have now been studied far far more than would normally be warranted:Nonc Hilaire wrote:Yes bollocks, and I would imagine ovarian cells would be involved as wellTyphoon wrote:Bollocks.
It is a complicated question, and every vaccine needs an independent assessment but this was a new hypothesis to me. The coincidental timing of the new vaccine technology and the sudden increase in autism is a question worth researching.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25086160
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25057578
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25057557
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24624471
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20669467
I'm not looking for a debate. I am simply noting that this is a now a reasonably coherent but unproven hypothesis active in the public at large (conspiracy theory) and we will be hearing more about it in the future.Typhoon wrote:Not even wrong.
The cause(s) of autism are still very much an open question and a very active area of research, however, vaccines have been ruled out.
This particular conspiracy theory is one that, I have to admit, I have little energy to debate.
My view is let people just do what they believe, with only one caveat:
Don't show up at the ER demanding treatment for your unvaccinated kid stricken with a disease easily avoided through vaccination.
Instead go on the internet and seek help from the antivaxxers.
Doc and folks,Doc wrote:
Nonc,Nonc Hilaire wrote: I'm not looking for a debate.
"It's not that the movie is anti-science; it's that the science is anti-CDC." - Liam Scheff
http://www.sott.net/article/315859-Shou ... ontroversyThe August 2014 release of audio recordings of conversations between Dr. Brian Hooker and senior CDC scientist Dr. William Thompson brought immense hope that the safety of vaccines would finally hit the mainstream; crushing the myth that the CDC is America's "trusted advisor" on health matters (note: their tagline is CDC 24/7: Saving Lives, Protecting People). Yet this remains the most censored story of the millennium; the media blackout continues and the smear campaign against Dr Wakefield remains, despite the painfully real implications of Dr. Thompson's testimony.
Here, Thompson speaks about the CDC corruption and cover-up:
"I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics. The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism." - Thompson, through his lawyer, August 2014
"The adjusted race-effect [for black boys and autism], statistical significance was huge.
After the meeting we decided to exclude reporting any race effects [showing elevated autism in black boys], the co-authors scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the study. The remaining four co-authors all met and brought a big garbage can into the meeting room and reviewed and went through all the hard copy documents that we had thought we should discard and put them in a huge garbage can." - Dr. William Thompson's deposition with Congressman Bill Posey
Thompson has asked that Congress subpoena him and investigate the CDC fraud, after handing over more than 100,000 pages of evidence. His requests remain unanswered, and he has built a relationship with Dr. Wakefield, his wife Carmel, and those he had once harmed.
"I have great shame now when I meet families with kids with autism because I have been part of the problem."
CDC whistleblower Dr. William Thompson
"I apologize again for the price you paid for my dishonesty... "
CDC whistleblower Dr. William Thompson to Dr Andrew Wakefield
"I do believe your husband's career was unjustly damaged and this study would have supported his scientific opinion. Hopefully I can help repair it."
Whistleblower Dr. William Thompson to Carmel Wakefield
I believe the director of the study when he says they brought in big garbage cans and destroyed data. That's a primary source.
(S)Nope.Nonc Hilaire wrote:I believe the director of the study when he says they brought in big garbage cans and destroyed data. That's a primary source.
Snopes isn't even a secondary source here. They never interviewed anybody, nor are they qualified to comment on research. They simply took CDC apologetics and repackaged them. This is a good example of why Snopes has such a poor reputation as an arbiter of truth.