The only way

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
Post Reply
manolo
Posts: 1582
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 4:46 pm

The only way

Post by manolo »

Folks,

Walking past a mosque today, I saw a sign in the window: “There is no deity only Allah.” This reminded me of something that happened last week. I was in the town and a man carrying a sign called out to me, “Jesus is the only way!”

The word “only” is intriguing in this context. If there is only Allah then what of Jesus? If Jesus is the only way, then what of Allah? While these positions seem contradictory, there is at least agreement between the followers that there is only an only way. There are not many or few ways according to these religions, but one “only” way.

As an agnostic, I do not currently believe that either of these ways is certainly true, but I do believe that whatever way there is out of this world, it is most likely the only way. The way could be religious, and any religion may or may not be the “way”, or alternatively the way out of this world could consist only in feeding the worms. But, it is not likely to be both.

The question I am interested in, is why do we feel drawn to an “only way”? Why do we not feel that there could be as many ways out of this world as there are species living on it? The call of a singularity seems very strong, even to an agnostic such as myself. I can't explain it.

Alex.
User avatar
Parodite
Posts: 5643
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:43 pm

Re: The only way

Post by Parodite »

When hundred people stand in a field and look at the moon in the sky at night... do they look at the same moon and is it "the only moon"? Or are there 100 different moons living in the heads of hundred different people? If you'd ask them, even when they are people of different faith, most would agree that there is only one moon. Hence little need to start paranoid wars over it.
Deep down I'm very superficial
Simple Minded

Re: The only way

Post by Simple Minded »

manolo wrote:Folks,

As an agnostic, I do not currently believe that either of these ways is certainly true, but I do believe that whatever way there is out of this world, it is most likely the only way. The way could be religious, and any religion may or may not be the “way”, or alternatively the way out of this world could consist only in feeding the worms. But, it is not likely to be both.

The question I am interested in, is why do we feel drawn to an “only way”? Why do we not feel that there could be as many ways out of this world as there are species living on it? The call of a singularity seems very strong, even to an agnostic such as myself. I can't explain it.

Alex.
Ways out of this world, pray to god or Allah or Jesus, fall into a black hole, die and feed worms. Pick the one that makes you most comfortable. Why do some proclaim Yamaha makes the best motorcycle, Ford the best pickup, or their Mama's chocolate chip cookies are the best?

Probably because that is what they like best.

The similar, but more interesting aspect to me, is why do people make claims of aspects of reality of which they are ignorant. The pizza made by the shop down the street from me, is better than the pizza made by the shop down the street from you.

Do humans fear the unknown, and fill in the void with imagination? From what I have seen, they often do.
Last edited by Simple Minded on Sun Dec 27, 2015 4:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Simple Minded

Re: The only way

Post by Simple Minded »

Parodite wrote:When hundred people stand in a field and look at the moon in the sky at night... do they look at the same moon and is it "the only moon"? Or are there 100 different moons living in the heads of hundred different people? If you'd ask them, even when they are people of different faith, most would agree that there is only one moon. Hence little need to start paranoid wars over it.
well said.
User avatar
Nonc Hilaire
Posts: 6168
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 1:28 am

Re: The only way

Post by Nonc Hilaire »

The verse is John 14:6.
“I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me."
The interpretation of this verse varies in Christianity, but the Qu'ran is explicit in stating that Jesus will return at the end of time and judge mankind. The Qu'ran states Muhammad will return as well, but as an observer without authority.

To borrow Parodite's moon analogy, if I told you the only way to the moon was up it would be indisputable but non-specific. Then we discuss rockets, flying saucers and psychedelic cereal.

If one believes Jesus was only a teacher or prophet the meaning of the verse becomes constricted to a single person who lived in Judea. If one believes Jesus was the single divine entity who existed since the beginning many interpretations of John 14:6 which do not involve Christianity become possible.
“Christ has no body now but yours. Yours are the eyes through which he looks with compassion on this world. Yours are the feet with which he walks among His people to do good. Yours are the hands through which he blesses His creation.”

Teresa of Ávila
manolo
Posts: 1582
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 4:46 pm

Re: The only way

Post by manolo »

Parodite wrote:When hundred people stand in a field and look at the moon in the sky at night... do they look at the same moon and is it "the only moon"? Or are there 100 different moons living in the heads of hundred different people? If you'd ask them, even when they are people of different faith, most would agree that there is only one moon. Hence little need to start paranoid wars over it.
Parodite,

John Paul Sartre made the point that two people climbing a mountain side by side are not climbing the same mountain. I can see that.

I'm not sure that followers of Muhammad or Jesus believe that the God they worship is not the only God. I can remember a time when I said to a Christian minister "If Jesus, why not Muhammad?" With some emotion, he replied, "You are morally sick!"

What did he mean?

Alex.
User avatar
Parodite
Posts: 5643
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:43 pm

Re: The only way

Post by Parodite »

manolo wrote:
Parodite wrote:When hundred people stand in a field and look at the moon in the sky at night... do they look at the same moon and is it "the only moon"? Or are there 100 different moons living in the heads of hundred different people? If you'd ask them, even when they are people of different faith, most would agree that there is only one moon. Hence little need to start paranoid wars over it.
Parodite,

John Paul Sartre made the point that two people climbing a mountain side by side are not climbing the same mountain. I can see that.
But it is false. My assumption still is you also live on same planet earth.
I'm not sure that followers of Muhammad or Jesus believe that the God they worship is not the only God. I can remember a time when I said to a Christian minister "If Jesus, why not Muhammad?" With some emotion, he replied, "You are morally sick!"

What did he mean?
Maybe he took your question as asking: "Why f*ck my own wife.. and not yours?" Adultery and heresy are brothers.
Deep down I'm very superficial
manolo
Posts: 1582
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 4:46 pm

Re: The only way

Post by manolo »

Parodite wrote:
manolo wrote:
Parodite wrote:When hundred people stand in a field and look at the moon in the sky at night... do they look at the same moon and is it "the only moon"? Or are there 100 different moons living in the heads of hundred different people? If you'd ask them, even when they are people of different faith, most would agree that there is only one moon. Hence little need to start paranoid wars over it.
Parodite,

John Paul Sartre made the point that two people climbing a mountain side by side are not climbing the same mountain. I can see that.
But it is false. My assumption still is you also live on same planet earth.
Parodite,

Of course Sartre was making a philosophical point as opposed to a geographical statement. As I understand it, Sartre's point is that each person is having a personal experience that is unavailable to the other. One may find the climbing hard and frightening and the other easy and exhilarating. There is a good deal of philosophy of mind around this subject, which I believe is unsettled to date, hence still philosophy.

Alex.
noddy
Posts: 11321
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 3:09 pm

Re: The only way

Post by noddy »

it tends to be the insecure and desperate practitioners of a particular religion that get caught up in the 'one and only way' as they seem to need the confirmation of their own choices.

most of the religious folks ive known have had a more ambivilent 'god will sort it out' approach to the others.
ultracrepidarian
Simple Minded

Re: The only way

Post by Simple Minded »

noddy wrote:it tends to be the insecure and desperate practitioners of a particular religion that get caught up in the 'one and only way' as they seem to need the confirmation of their own choices.

most of the religious folks ive known have had a more ambivilent 'god will sort it out' approach to the others.
Amazingly, living in the Bible Belt of the US, people seem much less concerned about the religions of others than they did back in upstate NY.

Luckily, the internet attracts those in need of confirmation bias like week old road kill attracts flies..... now if we can just figure out a way to wall off cyberspace....
noddy
Posts: 11321
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 3:09 pm

Re: The only way

Post by noddy »

Simple Minded wrote:. now if we can just figure out a way to wall off cyberspace....
its coming along fine - the new smart tv's show the way, take the keyboard off the stupid citizens and then let them choose the confirmation channels they prefer from a tiny subset of the net.
ultracrepidarian
Simple Minded

Re: The only way

Post by Simple Minded »

noddy wrote:
Simple Minded wrote:. now if we can just figure out a way to wall off cyberspace....
its coming along fine - the new smart tv's show the way, take the keyboard off the stupid citizens and then let them choose the confirmation channels they prefer from a tiny subset of the net.
technically, this problem was solved decades ago...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etch_A_Sketch
noddy
Posts: 11321
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 3:09 pm

Re: The only way

Post by noddy »

Simple Minded wrote:
noddy wrote:
Simple Minded wrote:. now if we can just figure out a way to wall off cyberspace....
its coming along fine - the new smart tv's show the way, take the keyboard off the stupid citizens and then let them choose the confirmation channels they prefer from a tiny subset of the net.
technically, this problem was solved decades ago...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etch_A_Sketch

it doesnt have a 'BUY NOW' button on it and it doesnt let interested 3rd parties put their own advertisements on it, fatal flaws...
ultracrepidarian
Simple Minded

Re: The only way

Post by Simple Minded »

noddy wrote:
Simple Minded wrote:
noddy wrote:
Simple Minded wrote:. now if we can just figure out a way to wall off cyberspace....
its coming along fine - the new smart tv's show the way, take the keyboard off the stupid citizens and then let them choose the confirmation channels they prefer from a tiny subset of the net.
technically, this problem was solved decades ago...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etch_A_Sketch

it doesnt have a 'BUY NOW' button on it and it doesnt let interested 3rd parties put their own advertisements on it, fatal flaws...
yer on your way to becoming a very wealthy man.....
manolo
Posts: 1582
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 4:46 pm

Re: The only way

Post by manolo »

Simple Minded wrote: Amazingly, living in the Bible Belt of the US, people seem much less concerned about the religions of others than they did back in upstate NY.
SM,

No surprises there.

Alex.
User avatar
Typhoon
Posts: 27242
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:42 pm
Location: 関西

Re: The only way

Post by Typhoon »

noddy wrote:it tends to be the insecure and desperate practitioners of a particular religion that get caught up in the 'one and only way' as they seem to need the confirmation of their own choices.
Exactly. Sums it up.
noddy wrote:most of the religious folks ive known have had a more ambivilent 'god will sort it out' approach to the others.
Live and let live is a reasonable way to live.
May the gods preserve and defend me from self-righteous altruists; I can defend myself from my enemies and my friends.
User avatar
Doc
Posts: 12562
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:10 pm

Re: The only way

Post by Doc »

Typhoon wrote:
noddy wrote:it tends to be the insecure and desperate practitioners of a particular religion that get caught up in the 'one and only way' as they seem to need the confirmation of their own choices.
Exactly. Sums it up.
noddy wrote:most of the religious folks ive known have had a more ambivilent 'god will sort it out' approach to the others.
Live and let live is a reasonable way to live.


Indeed

http://video.newyorker.com/watch/shorts ... ts-allowed
"I fancied myself as some kind of god....It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.” -- George Soros
User avatar
kmich
Posts: 1087
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:46 am

Re: The only way

Post by kmich »

Of course it is not just religion that becomes the proclaimed “only way;” such narrowness also is prevalent in many political and cultural ideologies, secular and religious, right and left.

Confusing times with the assorted unknowns and insecurities as well as the prevailing sense that one is being dominated by powers one does not control does not exactly encourage a live or let live approach. Instead, hiding out in reactionary religious and nationalist ideologies, often dressed up in preening self-righteousness or utopian, eschatological fantasies becomes the order of the day. The cost of passionate attachments nesting in a renewed sense of harmony and consistency may be decadence, decline, and fatuous triviality, but those are usually preferable to dissonance, ennui, and loss of meaning.

In the end though, such passions and sentiments, no matter how sincerely or strongly felt, do not form a coherent or effective response to contemporary challenges. Cathartic outbursts and strident consistency, no matter how self-satisfying, are never any substitute for hard won wisdom. Any effective response, to be vital, must rise out of a complete openness to the nuance, complexity, and typically bewildering novelties within contemporary challenges. This requires a degree of humility out of which certain understandings arise:

There are no perfect solutions for the challenges we face in maintaining decent and meaningful lives within a civilized context. In the end, no matter how necessarily insightful and creative we may be, all we can really do is fashion imperfect, temporary remedies to ameliorate the destructive impact of recurrent human evils, not just in others but in ourselves as well.
User avatar
Parodite
Posts: 5643
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:43 pm

Re: The only way

Post by Parodite »

No matter how complex, filled with uncertainties, joy and suffering, beauty and beastly ugliness our lives are... fortunately a live-let-live society where people can freely express their opinion, debate them anywhere and in parliament, vote at the ballot box, freely associate in business, practice a religion of choice at home and in private clubhouses, with laws that express the "do not do unto your neighbor that you don't want him to do unto you" (a healthy marriage between selfishness and empathy) upheld in independent courts... is a hard-won but operating reality. It is a garden that needs continuous care though and contrary to what some freedom-fundamentalists like to believe... also a strict set of laws and law enforcement. Not the only way, but the best way so far.
Deep down I'm very superficial
manolo
Posts: 1582
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 4:46 pm

Re: The only way

Post by manolo »

Folks,

Some good reading on this thread. :)

Alex.
Mr. Perfect
Posts: 16973
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:35 am

Re: The only way

Post by Mr. Perfect »

manolo wrote: The question I am interested in, is why do we feel drawn to an “only way”?
Because there is probably only one way.
Censorship isn't necessary
Mr. Perfect
Posts: 16973
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:35 am

Re: The only way

Post by Mr. Perfect »

Typhoon wrote: Live and let live is a reasonable way to live.
The most comfortable "only way" of them all.

That runs into trouble when you talk about things like polygamy, gun rights, methods and levels of taxation, and whether or not you should be forced into a government health care program. On and on and on and on and on.
Censorship isn't necessary
Mr. Perfect
Posts: 16973
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:35 am

Re: The only way

Post by Mr. Perfect »

noddy wrote:it tends to be the insecure and desperate practitioners of a particular religion that get caught up in the 'one and only way' as they seem to need the confirmation of their own choices.

most of the religious folks ive known have had a more ambivilent 'god will sort it out' approach to the others.
Not really. It is more about where you are on the born again/jaded spectrum, and a few other complexities.
Censorship isn't necessary
Mr. Perfect
Posts: 16973
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:35 am

Re: The only way

Post by Mr. Perfect »

Parodite wrote: fortunately a live-let-live society where people can freely express their opinion,
:) :) :)

Where is this society at.
Censorship isn't necessary
Post Reply