Sorry, but the regressive stereotype absolutely holds up: Education, Not Income, Predicted Who Would Vote For TrumpTyphoon wrote:Oh?Zack Morris wrote:HRCs support correlated with educational attainment. The Trump Davidians are the ones exhibiting the group think: culturally homogeneous, poorly educated, and poorly traveled.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... exit-polls
Among the more startling data to emerge from the [exit] polls:
White voters, who make up 69% of the total, voted 58% for Trump and 37% for Clinton. Non-white voters, who make up 31% of the electorate, voted 74% for Clinton and 21% for Trump.
White men opted 63% for Trump and 31% for Clinton; white women voted 53% for Trump and 43% for Clinton.
Among non-college-educated whites, 67% voted for Trump – 72% of men and 62% of women.
Among college-educated whites, 45% voted for Clinton – 39% of men and 51% of women (the only white demographic represented in the poll where the former secretary of state came out on top).
But 54% of male college graduates voted for Trump, as did 45% of female college graduates.
More 18- to 29-year-old whites voted for Trump (48%) than Clinton (43%).
And this is The Grauniad.
Apparently the accurate details will not be known until the US Census Board completes crunching the numbers.
The regressive-progressive stereotypes regarding Trump voters do not hold up under examination.
If you traveled the country as extensively as I do, you would immediately grasp the difference between Clinton-leaning and Trump-leaning regions. Your shallow, surface-level statistics are insufficient to build a picture of who these voters actually are.