Complaints
Complaints
Post them here, if you must.
Boo . . hiss . . .
Typhoon wrote:Another opportunity promote my unique device to protect onself from a too rapid ascent into Heaven:
No more worries about "Rapture Rupture".
Call now and we will throw in a free set of Ginsu knives.
Operators are standing by.
Off-topic . . belongs in Levitas . .
"The jawbone of an ass is just as dangerous a weapon today as in Sampson's time."
--- Richard Nixon
******************
"I consider looseness with words no less of a defect than looseness of the bowels."
—John Calvin
--- Richard Nixon
******************
"I consider looseness with words no less of a defect than looseness of the bowels."
—John Calvin
- YMix
- Posts: 4631
- Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 4:53 am
- Location: Department of Congruity - Report any outliers here
Re: Your Paganism
Probably, but I figure I should be more relaxed about moderating such off-topics or I'll get myself in trouble again.
“There are a lot of killers. We’ve got a lot of killers. What, do you think our country’s so innocent? Take a look at what we’ve done, too.” - Donald J. Trump, President of the USA
The Kushner sh*t is greasy - Stevie B.
The Kushner sh*t is greasy - Stevie B.
Thanks . . .
You do a good job as moderator, YMix, and you're safe on this one. The Colonel's slip is showing . . again . .YMix wrote:Probably, but I figure I should be more relaxed about moderating such off-topics or I'll get myself in trouble again.
"The jawbone of an ass is just as dangerous a weapon today as in Sampson's time."
--- Richard Nixon
******************
"I consider looseness with words no less of a defect than looseness of the bowels."
—John Calvin
--- Richard Nixon
******************
"I consider looseness with words no less of a defect than looseness of the bowels."
—John Calvin
Re: Complaints
1/ Topical humour regarding a preceding post is fine. This forum does not cater to the easily offended.
2/ I have full confidence in YMix as a mod.
2/ I have full confidence in YMix as a mod.
May the gods preserve and defend me from self-righteous altruists; I can defend myself from my enemies and my friends.
Re: Complaints
1) I'm not easily offended, nor am I offended at all in this instance. Your post was simply off-topic however you care to rationalize it. Your call, the topic will survive.Typhoon wrote:1/ Topical humour regarding a preceding post is fine. This forum does not cater to the easily offended.
2/ I have full confidence in YMix as a mod.
2) Seconded . . I too have full confidence in YMix as a moderator.
"The jawbone of an ass is just as dangerous a weapon today as in Sampson's time."
--- Richard Nixon
******************
"I consider looseness with words no less of a defect than looseness of the bowels."
—John Calvin
--- Richard Nixon
******************
"I consider looseness with words no less of a defect than looseness of the bowels."
—John Calvin
Re: Why are these guys always Republicans?
First, the OP is but a disingenuous attempt to smear Republicans with what Ib considers to be an offensive point of view.Typhoon wrote:This thread was flagged for review.
The start post
http://onthenatureofthings.net/forum/vi ... 31361links to an external site which in turn quotes excerpts from the author of
Letters to the Editor: Confessions of a Frustrated Conservative
Unless the above, self-published, book is a forgery, then it presumably reflects the views of it's author and thus the thread passes review.
Second, Ib lies about what the article says. What the guy actually asked was whether a life of slavery was any more cruel than a life in Africa during that time.
Third, if anyone thinks the views expressed in that article are "Republican" views, well . . they're just plain stupid. I lived for 15 years in Red River County, Texas, a county that had not voted Republican since the Civil War, and I cannot tell you how many times I heard Democrats voice the opinions expressed in that article and much, much worse.
The entire thread doesn't even belong in Hell, the thread and its intent belong in a septic tank.
Last edited by Marcus on Sun Oct 07, 2012 5:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The jawbone of an ass is just as dangerous a weapon today as in Sampson's time."
--- Richard Nixon
******************
"I consider looseness with words no less of a defect than looseness of the bowels."
—John Calvin
--- Richard Nixon
******************
"I consider looseness with words no less of a defect than looseness of the bowels."
—John Calvin
Re: Why are these guys always Republicans?
It is in the opening statement of Ibrahim:
It is one thing to link to an article or book and let the reader form his own opinion, but another to use that link to support the stereotyping smear you start with: the republican party nearly only consists of nearly complete rotten individuals.
This means he is stereotyping an entire community of people as "close" to being rotten. It also is in the subject title, suggestive of same.I'm not saying this guy us indicative of the entire party..... but he's close.
It is one thing to link to an article or book and let the reader form his own opinion, but another to use that link to support the stereotyping smear you start with: the republican party nearly only consists of nearly complete rotten individuals.
Deep down I'm very superficial
Re: Why are these guys always Republicans?
Bingo! A bigot is a bigot is a bigot . . we look for in others what we find in ourselves!Parodite wrote:It is in the opening statement of Ibrahim:This means he is stereotyping an entire community of people as "close" to being rotten. It also is in the subject title, suggestive of same.I'm not saying this guy us indicative of the entire party..... but he's close.
It is one thing to link to an article or book and let the reader form his own opinion, but another to use that link to support the stereotyping smear you start with: the republican party nearly only consists of nearly complete rotten individuals.
"The jawbone of an ass is just as dangerous a weapon today as in Sampson's time."
--- Richard Nixon
******************
"I consider looseness with words no less of a defect than looseness of the bowels."
—John Calvin
--- Richard Nixon
******************
"I consider looseness with words no less of a defect than looseness of the bowels."
—John Calvin
Re: Why are these guys always Republicans?
Both Republicrats and Demopublicans have been unfairly. and often outrageously, smeared in posts in the US section.
It appears to be a popular national pastime, so the thin-skinned should learn to deal with it.
It appears to be a popular national pastime, so the thin-skinned should learn to deal with it.
May the gods preserve and defend me from self-righteous altruists; I can defend myself from my enemies and my friends.
Re: Why are these guys always Republicans?
Nothing "thin-skinned" about thinking trash-talk belongs in Hell . .Typhoon wrote:Both Republicrats and Demopublicans have been unfairly. and often outrageously, smeared in posts in the US section.
It appears to be a popular national pastime, so the thin-skinned should learn to deal with it.
There was nothing whatever substantive in the OP . . just another bigoted attempt to smear the opposition. It's one thing to legitimately disagree in principle, quite another to descend into bigotry and prejudice in order to accuse others of bigotry and prejudice.
If hoping for something of substance in the Current Events forum is being "thin-skinned," then count me gulty-as-charged . .
"The jawbone of an ass is just as dangerous a weapon today as in Sampson's time."
--- Richard Nixon
******************
"I consider looseness with words no less of a defect than looseness of the bowels."
—John Calvin
--- Richard Nixon
******************
"I consider looseness with words no less of a defect than looseness of the bowels."
—John Calvin
Re: Why are these guys always Republicans?
This suggests it should be possible on this forum to unfairly and outrageously smear Islam and Muslims (as real or perceived)... without the thread ending up in Hell? That'll be the day.Typhoon wrote:Both Republicrats and Demopublicans have been unfairly. and often outrageously, smeared in posts in the US section.
It appears to be a popular national pastime, so the thin-skinned should learn to deal with it.
Deep down I'm very superficial
Re: Why are these guys always Republicans?
Skin Job spelled it out, but it has been patently obvious from the get-go that Ib's OP is sleazy attempt to smear Republicans and Conservatism with racism by quoting what Ib considers a racist and then applying his interpretation to an entire category of people. Nothing new there . . same ol' . . Liberals and Conservatives are not unique to the United States; Liberal and Conservative are transnational categories. A Liberal in, say, Canada finds Conservatives offensive wherever they're encountered.Typhoon wrote:Finally a poster pointed out the obvious fallacy in this line of argument - a standard misuse and misapplication of mathematical induction - generalizing from n = 1 to an entire group.
As for shamelessness, the view from abroad is that both conservatives and liberals are equally shameless in their smears.
Moreover, if anyone is naive enough to believe the views expressed in that article are Republican or Conservative views, well . . they are sadly misinformed. I lived for 15 years in Red River County, Texas, a county that had not voted Republican since before the Civil War, and I cannot tell you how many times I heard Democrats voice the opinions expressed in Ib's cited article and much, much worse.
In retrospect, the OP would best have been moved to Hell or, lacking that, perhaps to Levitas. Current Events should be reserved for more substantive topics.
"The jawbone of an ass is just as dangerous a weapon today as in Sampson's time."
--- Richard Nixon
******************
"I consider looseness with words no less of a defect than looseness of the bowels."
—John Calvin
--- Richard Nixon
******************
"I consider looseness with words no less of a defect than looseness of the bowels."
—John Calvin
Re: Complaints
Please do not post complaints in a thread, but use the appropriate section - this one.
Historically, both the US and ME subsections were created as mud pens with a cordon sanitaire - quarantine boundaries - to contain the uncivil and dirty mudslinging that both topics inevitably seem to give rise to.
The general Current Events section is held to a higher standard of more substantial topics.
Historically, both the US and ME subsections were created as mud pens with a cordon sanitaire - quarantine boundaries - to contain the uncivil and dirty mudslinging that both topics inevitably seem to give rise to.
The general Current Events section is held to a higher standard of more substantial topics.
May the gods preserve and defend me from self-righteous altruists; I can defend myself from my enemies and my friends.
Re: Why are these guys always Republicans?
There is an entire long thread devoted to debunking Goreian global warming ideology.Skin Job wrote:And yet, Gore's ideology, if enacted, would have caused far more damage than any of the right-wing wackos portrayed in this thread.
As this thread is about [fringe] Republicrats, that's what posted.
Don't care for either. What extremists at both end of the spectrum have in common is a hate for humanity.Skin Job wrote:So, how do you like your crazies, as repulsive yet harmless fringe elements, or slick, persuasive mainstream hucksters with supremely dangerous plans?
May the gods preserve and defend me from self-righteous altruists; I can defend myself from my enemies and my friends.
Re: Why are these guys always Republicans?
I dispute the notion that the OP, or the moderators for that matter, have the authority to define what sort of ideologue the phrase "these guys" encompasses.
Q: Why are these guys always Republicans?
A: They're not. Misanthropy knows no party lines.
Q: Why are these guys always Republicans?
A: They're not. Misanthropy knows no party lines.
- YMix
- Posts: 4631
- Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 4:53 am
- Location: Department of Congruity - Report any outliers here
Re: Why are these guys always Republicans?
Either I don't understand you correctly or you don't understand how a forum works.Skin Job wrote:I dispute the notion that the OP, or the moderators for that matter, have the authority to define what sort of ideologue the phrase "these guys" encompasses.
“There are a lot of killers. We’ve got a lot of killers. What, do you think our country’s so innocent? Take a look at what we’ve done, too.” - Donald J. Trump, President of the USA
The Kushner sh*t is greasy - Stevie B.
The Kushner sh*t is greasy - Stevie B.
Re: Why are these guys always Republicans?
Oh, I understand. You have the authority to move, delete, or ban, but you don't get to decide what words mean to us. Sorry to impugn your presumed omnipotence, sir.YMix wrote:Either I don't understand you correctly or you don't understand how a forum works.Skin Job wrote:I dispute the notion that the OP, or the moderators for that matter, have the authority to define what sort of ideologue the phrase "these guys" encompasses.
Re: Why are these guys always Republicans?
If there was only "Republicrats are naughty" or "Demopublicans are nasty" threads and posts in the US section, then you might have a valid argument.Skin Job wrote:Oh, I understand. You have the authority to move, delete, or ban, but you don't get to decide what words mean to us. Sorry to impugn your presumed omnipotence, sir.YMix wrote:Either I don't understand you correctly or you don't understand how a forum works.Skin Job wrote:I dispute the notion that the OP, or the moderators for that matter, have the authority to define what sort of ideologue the phrase "these guys" encompasses.
However, this is clearly not the case, there is plenty of both to go around, so what exactly is your issue?
May the gods preserve and defend me from self-righteous altruists; I can defend myself from my enemies and my friends.
Re: Why are these guys always Republicans?
Skin Job wrote:Oh, I understand. You have the authority to move, delete, or ban, but you don't get to decide what words mean to us. Sorry to impugn your presumed omnipotence, sir.YMix wrote:Either I don't understand you correctly or you don't understand how a forum works.Skin Job wrote:I dispute the notion that the OP, or the moderators for that matter, have the authority to define what sort of ideologue the phrase "these guys" encompasses.
I'll remind you to keep a civil tone when you address the staff. You don't pay them to take your guff.Well, you sure showed me!
Re: Complaints
I apologise for my ingratitude, and appreciate the opportunity to freely express selected opinions here on the forum.
Re: Complaints
Do you actually also behave in such a manner in person?Skin Job wrote:I apologise for my ingratitude, and appreciate the opportunity to freely express selected opinions here on the forum.
May the gods preserve and defend me from self-righteous altruists; I can defend myself from my enemies and my friends.
Re: Complaints
I went back and clicked on "Display this post" in order to find out what generated the subsequent exchange that was moved to Hell. No problem with that.'Farcus wrote:People who have conversations with their sock puppets are pathetic.Marcus wrote:A nice point, Skin Job, and nicely taken.Skin Job wrote:. . The truly great are almost universally humble, while pretenders need to strut and swagger.
"Ye shall know them by their hubris" . . .
Works for me . . should be the motto of these fora . . .
But why wasn't F's bullshit post (above) that started the whole thing not moved to Hell as well? It's plainly ad hominem abuse of me/Skin Job.
"The jawbone of an ass is just as dangerous a weapon today as in Sampson's time."
--- Richard Nixon
******************
"I consider looseness with words no less of a defect than looseness of the bowels."
—John Calvin
--- Richard Nixon
******************
"I consider looseness with words no less of a defect than looseness of the bowels."
—John Calvin
Re: Complaints
I am sincere in my gratitude for being allowed to post. Forgive me for the rest, please, I am not accustomed to being "moderated" in this fashion, and I was a bit upset.Typhoon wrote:Do you actually also behave in such a manner in person?Skin Job wrote:I apologise for my ingratitude, and appreciate the opportunity to freely express selected opinions here on the forum.