ATOL : Why 'Intelligent Design' subverts faith
Spenglerman is so far out of his element, his circle of competency, with this bit that he may as well be in Uranus.
No, the Tohoku tsunami struck a part of Japan with a relatively low population density.There is a false premise in Voltaire's argument, namely that humankind is always and inevitably subject to the ravages of cruel and capricious nature. We now build cities able to withstand earthquakes; the earthquake and tsunami that hit Japan in 2011 killed 16,000 people in much more densely populated regions, a terrible toll, to be sure, but a fraction of the Lisbon dead.
The Sumatra–Andaman earthquake and tsunami of 2004 killed an estimated 230,273 people.
Nope. Both the observational and experimental evidence is overwhelming with regards to evolution.Despite numerous attempts, including one by the anti-religious polemicist Richard Dawkins, Darwinians have failed to create a model that can predict evolution. University of Texas mathematician Granville Sewell, an Intelligent Design proponent, surveyed the damning evidence in a 2000 essay for The Mathematical Intelligencer. The quarrel between the Darwinians and the Creationists comes down to a confrontation between a quasi-religious belief that nature is a closed system that self-evolves in the absence of a creator, and the explicitly religious belief that a creator directs the process. The South Park caricature of Dawkins got it exactly right
Always a good idea to have a minimal grasp of the basics before pontificating: The evolution faq
Right on queue: Evolution of new genes captured
Spenglerman on earthquankes, tsunamis, and evolution = not even wrong