Re: The Donald....the newest savior.....
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 2:39 am
The new new carpetbaggers will be thrilled.
Another day in the Universe
https://www.onthenatureofthings.net/forum/
https://www.onthenatureofthings.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3443
How can it be that these two titans, Carson and Trump,Mr. Perfect wrote:No, Paul Ryan is the likely nominee at this point. Trump will be a footnote.
We already covered that in comprehensive detail.Typhoon wrote:How can it be that these two titans, Carson and Trump,Mr. Perfect wrote:No, Paul Ryan is the likely nominee at this point. Trump will be a footnote.
that doth bestride the narrow world,
Like a colossus, and we mere petty men
Walk under their huge legs and peep about.
How can such gifted geniuses*, both blow it so completely?
*well, to anyone who has never actually met a real genius.
Yes. He's a mulitbillionaire. It would be the crowning achievement of his life/career.Parodite wrote:It all begs the question..does/did Trump really want to be potus..
He builds skyscrapers for a living. What do you do for a living.or is he, indeed, an id*ot.
Thank You Very Much for your post, Zack Morris.Zack Morris wrote:Sanders won't run as independent. Trump can win as independent. Trump can't win as nominee. Trump won't be nominee. Cruz can't win as nominee. Cruz won't run as independent.
Congratulations, President Hillary Clinton!
Hmmnnnn.........Trump can win as independent.
And Congratulations to all Banksters especially the Premier American Bankster Gang Goldman Sachs..........Congratulations, President Hillary Clinton!
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/l ... ers-218689During the Democratic debate in January, Sanders criticized Clinton's Goldman Sachs ties, referring four times to tax returns released by her campaign showing she received a total of $675,000 for three speeches to the bank in 2013.
"Goldman Sachs is not going to bring forth a secretary of the Treasury for a Sanders administration," he said.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the ... dont-work/On Tuesday, Mrs. Clinton further complained, “Why is there one standard for me, and not for everybody else?”
The only different standard here is the one Mrs. Clinton set for herself, by personally earning $11 million in 2014 and the first quarter of 2015 for 51 speeches to banks and other groups and industries ...
Thank You Very Much for your post, Mr. Perfect.Mr. Perfect wrote:Trump vs Clinton vs Paul Ryan vs Sanders would be epic entertainment value. No idea who would be standing at the end.
http://lwv.org/content/who-will-elect-p ... ege-systemElection in the House and Senate
The Twelfth Amendment clarifies the procedures for so-called "contingent elections"-those that are thrown into the House and Senate for lack of an Electoral College majority.
The following rules regulate the House's choice of the President:
Only the top three vote getters in the electoral college are to be considered.
Regardless of its population and number of representatives, each state delegation in the House has only one vote, for a total of 50 votes. The District of Columbia, which sends a nonvoting delegate to the House, has no vote.
The state's choice is determine by a vote within its delegation. If that vote is a tie, the state loses its vote.
A winning candidate must receive the votes of a majority-26-of states.
There is no limit to the number of ballots in the House.
If the House fails to choose a President by Inauguration Day, January 20, the Twentieth Amendment requires that the Vice-President-elect, provided that the Senate has chosen one, serves as President until the House makes it choice.
The Senate follows these rules in its selection of the Vice-President:
The choice is between the top two vice-presidential vote-getters in the Electoral College.
Each senator has one vote, for a total of 100 votes (no vote for the District of Columbia).
A Vice-President must be elected by a majority-51-of the whole Senate.
If the Senate also fails to elect a Vice-President, the Succession Act of 1948 provides that the Speaker of the House shall act as President until a President is chosen.
The law was enacted under authority given to the Congress by the Twentieth Amendment.
Although the procedures for the way the House and Senate vote are set by the Constitution, there are no rules governing how individual members of Congress vote in such contingent elections in the House and Senate.
Members are free to vote as they please within their state's delegation.
It is conceivable, under these circumstances that the House might select a President of one party and the Senate, a Vice-President of the other.
Hard to see why he wouldn't. You're 74, this is your last/only chance, the money is pouring in, in your mind you would have won if but for a few missteps early on, you are a true believer, you were never a registered Democrat, etc.Zack Morris wrote:Sanders won't run as independent.
Thank You Very Much For Your Post, Mr. Perfect............Mr. Perfect wrote:Hard to see why he wouldn't. You're 74, this is your last/only chance, the money is pouring in, in your mind you would have won if but for a few missteps early on, you are a true believer, you were never a registered Democrat, etc.Zack Morris wrote:Sanders won't run as independent.
Hard to see why you wouldn't.
I don't think so.Mr. Perfect wrote:We already covered that in comprehensive detail.Typhoon wrote:How can it be that these two titans, Carson and Trump,Mr. Perfect wrote:No, Paul Ryan is the likely nominee at this point. Trump will be a footnote.
that doth bestride the narrow world,
Like a colossus, and we mere petty men
Walk under their huge legs and peep about.
How can such gifted geniuses*, both blow it so completely?
*well, to anyone who has never actually met a real genius.
Yes, we already covered it.Typhoon wrote: I don't think so.
Here is what we already covered.However, both misadventures can be summed up as two instructive examples of how highly domain specific expertise is rarely transferable.
Mr. P -- PLEASE --Mr. Perfect wrote:Yes, we already covered it.Typhoon wrote: I don't think so.
Here is what we already covered.However, both misadventures can be summed up as two instructive examples of how highly domain specific expertise is rarely transferable.
Yes, in the case of Carson, no in the case of Trump. In the case of Trump he is losing because of self destructive churchy conservatives like Glenn Beck who started the "never Trump" movement, an unprecedented phenomenon wherein a bloc of a party is throwing the election to the other side. It's never happened before.
I've spoken at length about the self destructive elements of both parties, both sides have people in them who under the right conditions harm their own cause self destructively. Unfortunately, this time it's happening to my side. If the churchy conservatives would have backed Trump as the eventual nominee as is the usual business for both sides then Trump would have beat Clinton.
As was all covered before.
If a single media personality can so easily derail Trump's campaign, then there are two possible conclusions:Mr. Perfect wrote:Yes, we already covered it.Typhoon wrote: I don't think so.
Here is what we already covered.However, both misadventures can be summed up as two instructive examples of how highly domain specific expertise is rarely transferable.
Yes, in the case of Carson, no in the case of Trump. In the case of Trump he is losing because of self destructive churchy conservatives like Glenn Beck who started the "never Trump" movement, an unprecedented phenomenon wherein a bloc of a party is throwing the election to the other side. It's never happened before.
I've spoken at length about the self destructive elements of both parties, both sides have people in them who under the right conditions harm their own cause self destructively. Unfortunately, this time it's happening to my side. If the churchy conservatives would have backed Trump as the eventual nominee as is the usual business for both sides then Trump would have beat Clinton.
As was all covered before.
Thank You Very Much for your post, Alex Manolo eThinker.........manolo wrote:Folks,
He's toast.
Sadly.
Alex.
Wow. It's hard to find posts this rich with fallacy, cognitive dissonance and misinformation. Well done.Typhoon wrote: If a single media personality can so easily derail Trump's campaign, then there are two possible conclusions:
1/ Beck is far far smarter and much more capable than Trump or
2/ The foundations on which the Trumps campaign stands would not pass even a cursory nudge nudge wink wink construction code inspection
Mr P ,Mr. Perfect wrote: Both sides have made a catastrophic choice to not vote for him in the general election.
Apr 12 2016, 6:07 am ET
Poll: Voters Split Between Clinton and Trump in Hypothetical November Matchup
What? You expect Obama to do anything about ISIS?Heracleum Persicum wrote:.
Donald Trump Has a Coherent, Realist Foreign Policy
Trump is articulating a bold vision of America’s role in the world.
Scary
.
Iran's Special Forces reportedly suffering heavy losses in Syria
Iran announces the killing of a first Iranian army soldier in battles in Syria
The al-Qaida affiliated Nusra Front released a video purportedly documenting the Iranian forces fleeing from the battlefield in Aleppo.
TEHRAN — Some 386,000 foreign nationals are studying at schools in Iran, while 360,000 of them are Afghan nationals, said Shahin Noushabadi, the deputy education minister for international affairs.
Those under-privileged foreign nationals who cannot afford tuition fees will be either entitled to discount of more than 80 percent or can pay the fee in installments, Mehr news agency quoted Noushabadi as saying.
Noushabadi went on to say that according to the decree issued by the supreme leader, all foreign nationals, even those who have no identification and are living in Iran illegally, can go to schools in the country.
.