Typhoon wrote:
Sorry, but I don't think that I am able to agree.
That means you are flying solo. Not one person on here thinks I'm a troll, makes trollish posts, or that I need any moderation whatsoever.
Not one single person on here agrees with you. Not one. They all had a chance to say "yeah that guy is a troll, he really needs banning and deleting". Everyone had a chance to say that,
not one single person did so, and those that did chime in
disagreed with you or were neutral at best.
OTOH the only admitted troll on this forum is ymix, who says he like twisting the knife in US conservatives. Ironically he is a moderator.
I'm not aware of another forum where such a large number of differing views on controversial topics are not only tolerated, but encouraged.
What is the sample size these days.
The US so-called "right wing" perspective continues to be well represented here.
Really. By who.
After a number of years of cleaning up after Mr. P.'s one line shill/troll posts
And it was all completely unnecessary. Once again,
not one single person on here agrees with you that I am a troll or in need of moderation.
Not one single person. All of that deleting was for nothing, nobody wanted you to do it but yourself.
Almost all my postings that were deleted were political content, specifically hard hitting criticisms of leftism, leftists and Democrats.
Why leftists and Democrats need you to protect them from me is way over my head.
and rudeness to and targeting/stalking of other posters, this mod has had it and given Mr. P. a one month suspension.
The bolded are not against the SFRs and I have no idea what they mean or how you tell if I'm "stalking" somebody. The only targeting I do is liberal nonsense, and I do that without discrimination in terms of the poster. "Conservatives" are often shocked when I go after them for spouting liberal horse crap, I make no allowances. I don't care who you are if you spout liberal bilge I will challenge it/you.
As for surliness or rudeness, I find it interesting coming form a poster who in the case of surliness, without any moderation told Doc he could shove it and Parodite that he was intellectual lazy, with flabby moral sensibilities. And no moderation was given on that.
As for rudeness I will say that I always, always, always, always, always allow the other poster to set the ground rules and ROEs for the debate. If they want to speak like an adult, I will speak like an adult. If they want clown noses and seltzer bottles I'll do that. If you insult my intelligence I will insult you right back. I have no problem with that. And neither should the other person, because I allow the first move every time. If they decide to start with an insult then they should expect insults in return.
Further, most liberals here at one time or another have parroted the liberal line of conservative republicans as being ignorant, racist, homophobic, misogynist, child killers, and when doing that you are saying that about
me.
Now I would say that I be entitled to quote from CeeLo chapter 10 verse 7 since I am innocent on all charges.
pc0mxOXbWIU
But that's not my style. I just get a wee bit grumpy or agitated.
A lot has been said about deterioration of relations and so forth over the years, and I'm amazed that anything needs to be said about, but when you tend to call people ignorant, racist, homophobic, misogynist child killers don't expect them to remain your back slapping buddies.
Of course, it's his choice after the suspension is over. He may instead prefer the company of cassowary, liang, and Ro Ri.
Is this an insult of some kind? Would this be considered an insulting post I wonder. I don't know who those people are other than Cassowary, all I can tell you is that I was welcomed warmly at the old forum by high quality posters like Booklady, CD, armchair pundit and Ethinker.
Bottom line is that I did not break the SFRs, not anymore than anyone else has. There simply is one set of rules for me and one set for everyone else.
Now, in the interest of solutions, for whatever reason it is clear that my attacks on liberalism and Democrats is difficult for you, but since nobody else sees any need to moderate me perhaps you could simply put me on ignore. Since I don't break the SFRs, and don't really do anything other than attack leftism and no one else seems to have a problem with me, should be a situation where everyone wins.