Whatever. Winning the electoral college and losing the popular vote remains the exception in our history and usually reflects significant, political divisions. A 230 K voter fraud favoring one side or the other in this day and age seems quite fanciful. The last time we had a true fraudulent situation in our presidential elections was the Hayes-Tilden contest of 1876, 11 years after our Civil War.YMix wrote:Taking into account voter fraud and disenfranchisement perpetrated by both sides?NapLajoieonSteroids wrote:The count puts a .002 margin between them. How much would you bet that we couldn't rout that out by the usual patterns of voter fraud?
Anyway, that wasn't the point for me, but rather the fact that the popular vote is split almost equally between the candidates. No landslide for Trump.
Its probably not necessary to be pissing in the victors' punch bowls right now, they will have a long four years to do that themselves.