Re: The eternal US elections - 2016 edition
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 9:36 pm
sCyzdD0vYOw
Another day in the Universe
https://www.onthenatureofthings.net/forum/
https://www.onthenatureofthings.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3435
With Ca-nada's inherent racism against people from California (A state with a bigger population than Ca-nada) it will never happen.YMix wrote:sCyzdD0vYOw
It’s too damn ironic.
The flamboyant founder of the Rent Is Too Damn High Party has endorsed moneybags landlord Donald Trump for president.
Jimmy McMillan made the stunning announcement Friday.
Brilliant.YMix wrote:sCyzdD0vYOw
Coming from a country where "None of the above" is a legal candidate....Typhoon wrote:Brilliant.YMix wrote:sCyzdD0vYOw
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/01/30 ... anada.htmlCandidate's legal name change puts 'none of the above' on ballot in Canada
Published January 30, 2016 FoxNews.com
The ballot to fill a legislative seat in Canada next month includes none of the above—and it’s a real person.
Sheldon Bergson, 46, had his name legally changed to Above Znoneofthe and is now a candidate for the Ontario legislature, the CBC reports. The election is Feb. 11.
The ballot lists candidates in alphabetical order by surname so his name will be the 10th of the 10 candidates as Znoneofthe Above, according to CBC.
“I’m aiming for all of the people who don’t normally vote,” Znoneofthe said. “I thought one of these days we should get ‘none of the above’ on the ballot.
The bank customer service rep has run for public office before as a National Party and independent candidate without success.
Znoneofthe vows to keep his new name if he is elected.
One of his opponents is running on the line of the None of The Above Party.
Not ironic at all given that progressives made the rent to damn high through rent controls limiting the number of available apartments.YMix wrote:It’s too damn ironic.
The flamboyant founder of the Rent Is Too Damn High Party has endorsed moneybags landlord Donald Trump for president.
Jimmy McMillan made the stunning announcement Friday.
Took me a while, but I got it.Doc wrote:With Ca-nada's inherent racism against people from California (A state with a bigger population than Ca-nada) it will never happen.YMix wrote:sCyzdD0vYOw
Yup. Iowa is the first one but is not a bellwhether or particularly important. The dowdy girl who shows up at the dance early and helps make the punch.Typhoon wrote:So there is an event, the Iowa Caucuses, going on now.
Going by memory, this is an event where the candidates have delegates to the conventions selected?
No. Democrats do not practice democracy. In Democrats, they have "Superdelegates" (pls google) so if Sanders wins majority of votes Hillary will still win. HIllary should be nominee.Heracleum Persicum wrote:.
The real revolution in Iowa was "Sanders" .. Hillary pretty much lost
Trump best candidate for that.But .. Sanders "central argument", political campaign financing overhaul, a non starter
Not really, if people outside system start winning big and making change, no reason to give money more. It's in the hands of the people, always has been.Congress and Senate must change that law, they ain't (no matter what) .. president has nothing to do with that
Where is it in the Constitution.Congress and Senate "representing" the SPECIAL INTEREST .. they no represent Joe .. this pretty much accepted (and in US constitution)
Who is doing the voting, do you think.There is "ZERO" chance American lawmakers (Senate and Congress) be (really) elected by Joe .. Zero chance
This definition of "Capitalism" .. Capitalism means people with money decide things ..
This is what is important about Iowa.NapLajoieonSteroids wrote:So now we get to spend the next several days going over how 'important' Iowa is, until the next primary, where we forget about the results and move on.
I curse those Iowans who have resurrected Marco Rubio.
Why are we addicted to these first term Senators? We really got to stop with that.
How Panglossian.Mr. Perfect wrote:I was actually worked up about it. Very interesting results. Both Cruz and Rubio are up over Clinton in RCP. If the choices are now between Rubio/Cruz/Trump that is a good thing for me.
Huh?Mr. Perfect wrote:3 of the top 4 GOP are ethnic minorities while the Democrats are lily white.
No. It's the born in Canada bit.Alexis wrote:Huh?Mr. Perfect wrote:3 of the top 4 GOP are ethnic minorities while the Democrats are lily white.
Having two parents from Cuba (Rubio), or even just a Cuban father (Cruz) is enough to be from an "ethnic minority"?
. . Rubio’s organization is not only his campaign but the Republican establishment and conservative movement as well. He can even count on the organized power of the mainstream media aiding him, for while the old media may dislike Republicans in general, they particularly loathe right-wing populist Republicans like Cruz and Trump.
His boyfriend Goldman Sachs dumped him last week.Heracleum Persicum wrote:BTW, where was JEB ? ? ? .. has he quit ?
Nonc Hilaire wrote:.
His boyfriend Goldman Sachs dumped him last week.Heracleum Persicum wrote:.
BTW, where was JEB ? ? ? .. has he quit ?
.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-02-0 ... ailed-bush
.
Yes. They are both Hispanic. Carson is black.Alexis wrote:Huh?Mr. Perfect wrote:3 of the top 4 GOP are ethnic minorities while the Democrats are lily white.
Having two parents from Cuba (Rubio), or even just a Cuban father (Cruz) is enough to be from an "ethnic minority"?