The Daily Freak Show
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 2:02 am
[deleted.]
Another day in the Universe
https://www.onthenatureofthings.net/forum/
https://www.onthenatureofthings.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3744
Seriously? You have a problem with this being posted?Typhoon wrote:Enough with the freak show.
3KKPpjN5PTc
I think I can answer the question she screamed out a couple years ago during her campaign:Doc wrote:3KKPpjN5PTc
talk about.... moojo..kmich wrote:[youtube]I4Q3YDezqcM[/youtube]
https://www.dailywire.com/news/28160/no ... oseph-curl“They would make Judy’s life miserable on set by putting their hands under her dress," wrote Sid Luft, who married Garland in 1952. "The men were 40 or more years old.”
“They were drunks,” Garland said in a 1967 interview with TV talk show host Jack Paar. “They put them all in one hotel … they got smashed every night, and the police had to pick them up in butterfly nets.”
https://start.att.net/news/read/article ... egory/newsA new report found that one in three girls wearing school uniforms in the United Kingdom has been sexually harassed in public, while two-thirds say they’ve received unwanted sexual attention.
“It’s simply not acceptable that girls as young as 12 are being wolf-whistled at in public, touched against their will, stared at or even followed,” Tanya Barron, chief executive of Plan International UK, the organization that commissioned the report, told BBC.
Wow! How am I supposed to feel safe knowing that somewhere, even 10,000+ miles away from me, this level of insensitivity may exist somewhere on Earth.noddy wrote:I think its probably always happened and the only thing thats changed is that some groups thinking that being annoyed/upset is cause of concern.
if you surveyed billions of women across thousands of years and asked them if a seedy guy whistling was the worst problem in their life they might look at you funny.
truly, we are at peak comfort when these are the concerns of a political movement.
You sir, are a genius. Shame to waste that talent on programming, as a Lawyer, you'd be an extremely wealthy, um, person of some sort.noddy wrote:easy, just identify as something else and then sue your former self for abuse .
then, claim bankruptcy and get the government to pay for it.
that would certainly empower all the https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/legbeard and https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/neckbeard communities.Simple Minded wrote: I was thinking more of the Biblical moral high ground of "an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth." If someone touches you inappropriately, just do the same back to them!
Problem solved. Everyone wins, er, uh, suffers victimhood equally. Which is really the goal, it appears.
speaking on the behalf of fuglies everywhere, I think we have a "right" to touch beautiful people like you inappropriately, whenever we want. It's Social Justice, just like a progressive income tax, housing subsidies, free scooters for fatties, etc.noddy wrote:that would certainly empower all the https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/legbeard and https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/neckbeard communities.Simple Minded wrote: I was thinking more of the Biblical moral high ground of "an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth." If someone touches you inappropriately, just do the same back to them!
Problem solved. Everyone wins, er, uh, suffers victimhood equally. Which is really the goal, it appears.
the beautiful people, like me, would suffer greatly.