Which would be remarkable considering I'm not American, not right wing, and have healthy retina.Zack Morris wrote:Sounds like you suffer from the same massive blind spot that Doc and most of the US right wing do.Typhoon wrote: Actually, no. The US so-called progressive media is obsessed with the classifying people according to race (and gender and sexual orientation and . . . ) as much, if not more so, than US social conservatives. Their online media are full of it every day. These so-called progressives big mistake is a familiar historic one, assuming that individuals and society are a tabula rasa - blank slate - on whom new social norms can easily be imposed, er, legislated, er, written. Push back is the natural to-be-expected reaction. Doc alluded to this in another thread when he wrote about "cultural imperialism". If he is correct, and it is not just "the economy, stupid", then the US Senate is going to have a Republican majority for a while yet.
And what inflammatory rhetoric is the WSJ using?Zack Morris wrote:The "so-called" "progressive" media (Slate? Salon? The Nation?) do indeed perform a lot of hand-wringing about race issues. Apparently, this is a shiny distraction that blinds you from the fact that the right wing acts to impose or defend racial disparities. "So-called progressive" local politicians haven't been comparing blacks to monkeys (including the former President and his wife). Nor is it they who constantly work to disenfranchise minority voters (US courts have repeatedly had to get involved in race-based gerrymandering cases). It's not the lefty media who refuse to have a conversation about police discrimination and whine about how "there was no racism before Obama". It's not the progressive media using hostile, inflammatory rhetoric that makes minorities feel unsafe.
I lived in the US for ~ 7 years. The conservative Midwest of suburban Chicagoland.Zack Morris wrote:Why don't you ask minorities here about why they feel unsafe or have them describe incidents that have made them fear for their safety? Then, ask conservatives the same question. You're very likely to hear personal stories from one group and wild conspiracy theories and conjecture about what "liberals" allegedly want to do, as imagined by right wing talk radio.
Back in the days when the homicide was the highest ever, including the 1920's and today.
The few negative incidents that I did experience all involved minorities. Go figure.
Unfortunately for you, I do know a lot of Americans, some are conservative, some are liberal.
Almost all are unimpressed by current histrionics, be it from the left or the right.
Although few with liberal views did have a bit of a meltdown after this past POTUS election
However, rather than personal stories and anecdotes,I prefer US CDC statistics.
The sad reality is that the leading cause of death in the US of young black men, 15 to 34, is other young black men.
For hispanic men in the same age range, homicide by other hispanic men is the second leading cause of death.
I am familiar with US history.Zack Morris wrote:It's not the media that's the problem here. That's a lazy cop-out. The media obsesses about all kinds of things. But America's nasty atavistic racism goes back very, very far.
As for today, both the right and the media, especially in this new era of clickbait, blows incidents completely out of all proportion while real issues such as those that I noted above are studiously ignored.