Generative ML [AI] | ChatGPT and other software

[Heracleum Persicum]

the future was yesterday.

https://theconversation.com/israels-ai- ... war-219302

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/ ... ng-targets

its a shame the articles had a "trigger word" for one of the posters and caused a malignant monomania moment.

the AI in the topic of this thread is already being used in war to pick targets in a current conflict, if it is deemed succesful, we can see quite cleary what next generation law enforcement smells like.

never in the course of human history will it have been as important to be as mediocre as possible in your outward appearance.

As said in above post, in "Guerrilla warfare" the regular army is "blind" as there no pattern to distinguished the combatants from the population. There no "tags" to build an Algorithm around them.

Lots of gimmick tried in "Guerrilla warfare" .. I remember US starting using "insects" to smell the "body odor" of VietCong in tunnels

There no "Guerrilla warfare" where the regular army at the end did not lose .. just look @ French in Algeria or Italians in Ethiopia and US in Vietnam, Afghanistan and now Iraq

"Guerrilla warfare" can only be initiated when population is in tune with the combatants, population part of combatants

AI just the new "buzzword"
.

[noddy]

As said in above post

dont need pattern matching AI for that.

[Doc]

the future was yesterday.

https://theconversation.com/israels-ai- ... war-219302

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/ ... ng-targets

its a shame the articles had a "trigger word" for one of the posters and caused a malignant monomania moment.

the AI in the topic of this thread is already being used in war to pick targets in a current conflict, if it is deemed succesful, we can see quite cleary what next generation law enforcement smells like.

never in the course of human history will it have been as important to be as mediocre as possible in your outward appearance.

As said in above post, in "Guerrilla warfare" the regular army is "blind" as there no pattern to distinguished the combatants from the population. There no "tags" to build an Algorithm around them.

Lots of gimmick tried in "Guerrilla warfare" .. I remember US starting using "insects" to smell the "body odor" of VietCong in tunnels

There no "Guerrilla warfare" where the regular army at the end did not lose .. just look @ French in Algeria or Italians in Ethiopia and US in Vietnam, Afghanistan and now Iraq

"Guerrilla warfare" can only be initiated when population is in tune with the combatants, population part of combatants

AI just the new "buzzword"
.

That is because you never hear about the times when the Army won. Just another failed insurgency. Just ask Che Guvara Outside of Cuba he was a complete flop as a Guerrilla revolutionary.

[Doc]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cn7tOHnp68

This New AI Generated Scam Is a Mind-Bender

[Parodite]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cn7tOHnp68

This New AI Generated Scam Is a Mind-Bender

Means that bit by bit the Internet loses value as a source of reliable information and a safe medium to do business. A location less and less people think is a good place to be. Even a dangerous one. With science and academia also going downhill, infested with woke ideology and science-averse incentive structures doing great damage from within.

How much science and truth we need? If all science and tech dev would come to a halt today, enough knowledge is available to maintain society as we know it. Which is not bad. If however truth in general is up for grabs with trust eroding and no ways and location available to restore them, we are in bigger trouble.

[Parodite]

In the mean time:

HOLY $%#@ - AI Music is Absolutely INSANE (Suno AI V3)

[Heracleum Persicum]

the future was yesterday.

https://theconversation.com/israels-ai- ... war-219302

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/ ... ng-targets

its a shame the articles had a "trigger word" for one of the posters and caused a malignant monomania moment.

the AI in the topic of this thread is already being used in war to pick targets in a current conflict, if it is deemed succesful, we can see quite cleary what next generation law enforcement smells like.

never in the course of human history will it have been as important to be as mediocre as possible in your outward appearance.

As said in above post, in "Guerrilla warfare" the regular army is "blind" as there no pattern to distinguished the combatants from the population. There no "tags" to build an Algorithm around them.

Lots of gimmick tried in "Guerrilla warfare" .. I remember US starting using "insects" to smell the "body odor" of VietCong in tunnels

There no "Guerrilla warfare" where the regular army at the end did not lose .. just look @ French in Algeria or Italians in Ethiopia and US in Vietnam, Afghanistan and now Iraq

"Guerrilla warfare" can only be initiated when population is in tune with the combatants, population part of combatants

AI just the new "buzzword"
.

That is because you never hear about the times when the Army won. Just another failed insurgency. Just ask Che Guvara Outside of Cuba he was a complete flop as a Guerrilla revolutionary.


.

Definition of "insurgency" is when the population is backing, agrees, is part of the uprising.

No military in human history ever has beaten that.

Reason is, a regular army would be fighting the population, by definition lost case from the start.

We saw this in Vietnam (Vietcong and population were same), we saw this in Algeria fighting French colonial military, and now we witnessing this with Palestinians fighting the Zionist.


" Che Guevara " was a dreamer and amateur, he had no support from population mass .. CIA paid the farmers and they delivered Che .. his was not an insurgency, no uprising, he thought he fighting for the poor people .. anybody fighting for poor people has lost the fight.

Palestinians nor Vietnamese nor Khaomeini Mull*ha fighting for poor people

Many "amateur analysts" (and professional agents) were and are saying Palestinians do not support the fight, wanting to say this no insurgency and uprising .. they foolin Joe.

[Doc]

the future was yesterday.

https://theconversation.com/israels-ai- ... war-219302

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/ ... ng-targets

its a shame the articles had a "trigger word" for one of the posters and caused a malignant monomania moment.

the AI in the topic of this thread is already being used in war to pick targets in a current conflict, if it is deemed succesful, we can see quite cleary what next generation law enforcement smells like.

never in the course of human history will it have been as important to be as mediocre as possible in your outward appearance.

As said in above post, in "Guerrilla warfare" the regular army is "blind" as there no pattern to distinguished the combatants from the population. There no "tags" to build an Algorithm around them.

Lots of gimmick tried in "Guerrilla warfare" .. I remember US starting using "insects" to smell the "body odor" of VietCong in tunnels

There no "Guerrilla warfare" where the regular army at the end did not lose .. just look @ French in Algeria or Italians in Ethiopia and US in Vietnam, Afghanistan and now Iraq

"Guerrilla warfare" can only be initiated when population is in tune with the combatants, population part of combatants

AI just the new "buzzword"
.

That is because you never hear about the times when the Army won. Just another failed insurgency. Just ask Che Guvara Outside of Cuba he was a complete flop as a Guerrilla revolutionary.


.

Definition of "insurgency" is when the population is backing, agrees, is part of the uprising.

No military in human history ever has beaten that.

Reason is, a regular army would be fighting the population, by definition lost case from the start.

We saw this in Vietnam (Vietcong and population were same), we saw this in Algeria fighting French colonial military, and now we witnessing this with Palestinians fighting the Zionist.


" Che Guevara " was a dreamer and amateur, he had no support from population mass .. CIA paid the farmers and they delivered Che .. his was not an insurgency, no uprising, he thought he fighting for the poor people .. anybody fighting for poor people has lost the fight.

Palestinians nor Vietnamese nor Khaomeini Mull*ha fighting for poor people

Many "amateur analysts" (and professional agents) were and are saying Palestinians do not support the fight, wanting to say this no insurgency and uprising .. they foolin Joe.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/insurgency

insurgency
politics

Category: History & Society
Related Topics: civil war collective violence revolution domestic terrorism
Insurgency, term historically restricted to rebellious acts that did not reach the proportions of an organized revolution. It has subsequently been applied to any such armed uprising, typically guerrilla in character, against the recognized government of a state or country.

In traditional international law, insurgency was not recognized as belligerency, and insurgents lacked the protection customarily extended to belligerents. Herbert W. Briggs in The Law of Nations (1952) described the traditional point of view as follows:

The existence of civil war or insurrection is a fact. Traditionally, the fact of armed rebellion has not been regarded as involving rights and obligations under international law.…Recognition of the belligerency of the insurgents by the parent State or of the contestants by foreign States changes the legal situation under international law. Prior to such recognition, foreign States have a legal right to aid the parent State put down a revolt, but are under a legal obligation not to aid insurgents against the established government.

insurgency
insurgency
The body of an African Union peacekeeper, killed in clashes between Somali government forces and Islamist insurgents, being dragged through the streets of Mogadishu, Somalia, in October 2010.
The status of the faction opposing a government was usually determined by what Charles Cheney Hyde described as “the nature and extent of the insurrectionary achievement.” If the government was able to suppress the hostile faction rapidly, the event was described as a “rebellion.” In such cases recognition of the insurgents by a third party was regarded as “premature recognition,” a form of illegal intervention. If the insurgents became a serious challenge to the government and achieved formal recognition as “belligerents,” then the struggle between the two factions became in international law the equivalent of war. Support given to the insurgents by a third party amounted to that foreign government’s participation in the war.

After World War II the emergence of a number of Communist states and of new nations in Asia and Africa changed the established international legal doctrine on insurgency. Communist states claimed the right to support insurgents engaged in “just wars of national liberation.” The new nations resulting from decolonization in Asia and Africa after World War II supported in most cases insurgents who invoked the principle of “national self-determination.” The United States and other Western countries in turn rejected such intervention as “indirect aggression” or “subversion.” International legal consensus regarding insurgency thus broke down as the result of regional and ideological pressures.

At the same time, humanitarian considerations prompted the international community to extend protection to persons involved in any “armed conflict” regardless of its formal legal status. This was done through the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, one of four agreements drafted in August 1949. Members of “organized resistance movements” are protected if in conducting their operations they have acted in military fashion, whereas insurgents lacking formal belligerent status were not protected under traditional international law.

[Typhoon]

the future was yesterday.

https://theconversation.com/israels-ai- ... war-219302

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/ ... ng-targets

its a shame the articles had a "trigger word" for one of the posters and caused a malignant monomania moment.

the AI in the topic of this thread is already being used in war to pick targets in a current conflict, if it is deemed succesful, we can see quite cleary what next generation law enforcement smells like.

never in the course of human history will it have been as important to be as mediocre as possible in your outward appearance.

As said in above post, in "Guerrilla warfare" the regular army is "blind" as there no pattern to distinguished the combatants from the population. There no "tags" to build an Algorithm around them.

Lots of gimmick tried in "Guerrilla warfare" .. I remember US starting using "insects" to smell the "body odor" of VietCong in tunnels

There no "Guerrilla warfare" where the regular army at the end did not lose .. just look @ French in Algeria or Italians in Ethiopia and US in Vietnam, Afghanistan and now Iraq

"Guerrilla warfare" can only be initiated when population is in tune with the combatants, population part of combatants

AI just the new "buzzword"
.

Off topic. However:

Wikipedia | Historical list of revolutions and rebellions

Some succeeded, many failed.

[Typhoon]

Microsoft | VASA-1: Lifelike Audio-Driven Talking Faces
Generated in Real Time

[Nonc Hilaire]

IMG_4805.jpeg (160.2 KiB) Viewed 28 times