Page 5 of 6

Re: Research and Development; Invention and Innovation

Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2019 1:41 pm
by Simple Minded
Colonel Sun wrote:Quillette | What’s Happening to Technological Progress?
If current rules and regulations had been in existence in the 1900s and the first half of the 20th century we would not have airplanes, air conditioning, antibiotics, automobiles, chlorine, the measles and smallpox vaccines, cardiac catheters, open heart surgery, radio, refrigeration and X-rays. The universal principle of risk aversion in the past hampered only individuals, and if only one individual in a million was immune (that is, if one in a million did not share this risk aversion) that was enough for progress to occur. Now, this risk aversion is firmly entrenched in legislation all over the world, and it is throttling innovation, leading to actions that Kahneman describes as “detrimental to the wealth of individuals, to the soundness of policy, and to the welfare of society.” The bottom line is that risk adversity is fundamentally bad for productivity, and especially for research and development.
excellent article. having worked at both small companies and big companies, it is not unusual for the small "skunk works" type of job shops to be 10x more productive.

We have all heard the quip that "if it saves just one life it is worth it!"

at a former employer, one of the mandates to come out of the quest for a "Safety Conscious Work Environment" (SCWE) (one can't have too many acronyms), is that employees must back their cars into the parking spaces so that they can drive out forward because it is safer. No joke.

Re: Research and Development; Invention and Innovation

Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2019 2:20 am
by Doc
Simple Minded wrote:
Colonel Sun wrote:Quillette | What’s Happening to Technological Progress?
If current rules and regulations had been in existence in the 1900s and the first half of the 20th century we would not have airplanes, air conditioning, antibiotics, automobiles, chlorine, the measles and smallpox vaccines, cardiac catheters, open heart surgery, radio, refrigeration and X-rays. The universal principle of risk aversion in the past hampered only individuals, and if only one individual in a million was immune (that is, if one in a million did not share this risk aversion) that was enough for progress to occur. Now, this risk aversion is firmly entrenched in legislation all over the world, and it is throttling innovation, leading to actions that Kahneman describes as “detrimental to the wealth of individuals, to the soundness of policy, and to the welfare of society.” The bottom line is that risk adversity is fundamentally bad for productivity, and especially for research and development.
excellent article. having worked at both small companies and big companies, it is not unusual for the small "skunk works" type of job shops to be 10x more productive.

We have all heard the quip that "if it saves just one life it is worth it!"

at a former employer, one of the mandates to come out of the quest for a "Safety Conscious Work Environment" (SCWE) (one can't have too many acronyms), is that employees must back their cars into the parking spaces so that they can drive out forward because it is safer. No joke.
Expertise usually places but rarely comes in first because experts have to justify their existence.

IRVdiHu1VCc

Re: Research and Development; Invention and Innovation

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2019 5:28 pm
by Typhoon

Re: Research and Development; Invention and Innovation

Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2019 12:40 am
by Typhoon

Re: Research and Development; Invention and Innovation

Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2019 1:39 am
by Miss_Faucie_Fishtits
We have a banner honouring Hedy Lamarr at the Museum of Broadcasting. She isn't in our roll of Electronic Communication but there are a couple of notable women pioneers.....'>....:

https://museumofbroadcasting.org/ec-pioneers.html

Re: Research and Development; Invention and Innovation

Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2019 5:36 am
by Typhoon
Miss_Faucie_Fishtits wrote:We have a banner honouring Hedy Lamarr at the Museum of Broadcasting. She isn't in our roll of Electronic Communication but there are a couple of notable women pioneers.....'>....:

https://museumofbroadcasting.org/ec-pioneers.html
Thanks for the link. Looks like an interesting museum.

I would suggest adding James Clark Maxwell, who predicted the existence of electromagnetic waves, John Baird, and Philo T. Farnsworth

Re: Research and Development; Invention and Innovation

Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:04 pm
by Typhoon
-fu03F-Iah8

Re: Research and Development; Invention and Innovation

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2019 3:52 am
by Doc
Colonel Sun wrote: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:04 pm -fu03F-Iah8
That is amazing that no one thought of this before.

Re: Research and Development; Invention and Innovation

Posted: Wed Oct 23, 2019 1:03 am
by Typhoon

Re: Research and Development; Invention and Innovation

Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2019 7:18 pm
by Typhoon

Re: Research and Development; Invention and Innovation

Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 8:20 am
by Doc
Colonel Sun wrote: Mon Dec 16, 2019 7:18 pm APS | A material that combines graphite with cellulose from wood pulp is lighter and stronger than structural materials like steels, titanium alloys, and carbon fibers.

Quite a claim. Would [wood?] be good if it stands up to future R&D.

I'd love to sail such a wooden boat.
I wonder how it would hold up to mold?

Re: Research and Development; Invention and Innovation

Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2020 11:27 am
by NapLajoieonSteroids
qOg3aWwE_a0

Re: Research and Development; Invention and Innovation

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 11:03 pm
by Typhoon
AIP | Extreme High-Frequency Signals Enable Terabits-Per-Second Data Links
March 31, 2020 — Using the same technology that allows high-frequency signals to travel on regular phone lines, researchers tested sending extremely high-frequency, 200 GHz signals through a pair of copper wires. The result is a link that can move data at rates of terabits per second, significantly faster than currently available channels.

Re: Research and Development; Invention and Innovation

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 3:29 am
by Typhoon
Doc wrote: Sun Dec 22, 2019 8:20 am
Colonel Sun wrote: Mon Dec 16, 2019 7:18 pm APS | A material that combines graphite with cellulose from wood pulp is lighter and stronger than structural materials like steels, titanium alloys, and carbon fibers.

Quite a claim. Would [wood?] be good if it stands up to future R&D.

I'd love to sail such a wooden boat.
I wonder how it would hold up to mold?
I suspect better than a conventional wooden boat.

Re: Research and Development; Invention and Innovation

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 3:30 am
by Typhoon
MIT Tech Rev | Covid-19 has blown apart the myth of Silicon Valley innovation
The pandemic shows that the US is no longer much good at coming up with technologies relevant to our most basic needs.

Re: Research and Development; Invention and Innovation

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 8:52 am
by Doc
Colonel Sun wrote: Sun Apr 26, 2020 3:30 am MIT Tech Rev | Covid-19 has blown apart the myth of Silicon Valley innovation
The pandemic shows that the US is no longer much good at coming up with technologies relevant to our most basic needs.
I think that is a bit much. Given all the lies the entire world was told about the CCP Virus. I suppose the article is dead on in regards to welding people in their homes and better means to curtail freedom of speech.

I wonder if Rotman is one of the "1,000 talents"?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thousand_ ... n#Reaction

Re: Research and Development; Invention and Innovation

Posted: Sun Jul 05, 2020 7:41 am
by Typhoon
MIT Tech Rev | Why venture capital doesn’t build the things we really need
In the United States, 75% of venture capital goes to software. Some 5 to 10% goes to biotech. The other sliver goes to everything else—transportation, sanitation, health care. No wonder the pandemic has exposed venture capital’s broader failures.

Re: Research and Development; Invention and Innovation

Posted: Sun Jul 05, 2020 8:08 am
by noddy
Doc wrote: Sun Apr 26, 2020 8:52 am
Colonel Sun wrote: Sun Apr 26, 2020 3:30 am MIT Tech Rev | Covid-19 has blown apart the myth of Silicon Valley innovation
The pandemic shows that the US is no longer much good at coming up with technologies relevant to our most basic needs.
I think that is a bit much. Given all the lies the entire world was told about the CCP Virus. I suppose the article is dead on in regards to welding people in their homes and better means to curtail freedom of speech.

I wonder if Rotman is one of the "1,000 talents"?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thousand_ ... n#Reaction
its no slight on the people of America or the Americans on this forum to say that globally, the American response is the worst , by the numbers.

spent the most money to get the least good outcomes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronavir ... _responses

top 3 for most government stimulus (aka future tax payer problems)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronavirus_recession

top 3 for most unemployemnt (aka future tax payer problems)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic

most deaths.

I realise their are lots of quibbles and knee jerks to this reality, especially with brazil and china hiding real stats but all together, its the worst combination.

Re: Research and Development; Invention and Innovation

Posted: Sun Jul 05, 2020 3:23 pm
by Doc
noddy wrote: Sun Jul 05, 2020 8:08 am
Doc wrote: Sun Apr 26, 2020 8:52 am
Colonel Sun wrote: Sun Apr 26, 2020 3:30 am MIT Tech Rev | Covid-19 has blown apart the myth of Silicon Valley innovation
The pandemic shows that the US is no longer much good at coming up with technologies relevant to our most basic needs.
I think that is a bit much. Given all the lies the entire world was told about the CCP Virus. I suppose the article is dead on in regards to welding people in their homes and better means to curtail freedom of speech.

I wonder if Rotman is one of the "1,000 talents"?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thousand_ ... n#Reaction
its no slight on the people of America or the Americans on this forum to say that globally, the American response is the worst , by the numbers.
First this isn't over Secondly the numbers per million say a different story on which country is worse

spent the most money to get the least good outcomes.
The money was spent to keep the economy going, not stopping the CCP virus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronavir ... _responses

top 3 for most government stimulus (aka future tax payer problems)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronavirus_recession

top 3 for most unemployemnt (aka future tax payer problems)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic

most deaths.

I realise their are lots of quibbles and knee jerks to this reality, especially with brazil and china hiding real stats but all together, its the worst combination.
Again most deaths because the US is a big country. If you take the EU as a whole they have had more deaths than the US. At least last time I checked. But like I siad this is not over. Crowing about which countries did worse or better is likely going to morph into a crow dinner.

Having said that I would note that 70% that died of the CCP virus in Pennsylvania and a large portion of those who died in NY state, died in nursing homes because that is where the Democrat governors of those states sent people with the virus to die. Which in turn infected other people in those nursing homes who also ended up dying.

Re: Research and Development; Invention and Innovation

Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 1:41 am
by Typhoon
ACM | Where Have All the Domestic Graduate Students Gone?

One of the better replies

118582851_10157148416375806_72050482142881883_n.jpg
118582851_10157148416375806_72050482142881883_n.jpg (205.65 KiB) Viewed 5981 times

Re: Research and Development; Invention and Innovation

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2020 3:50 am
by Typhoon

Re: Research and Development; Invention and Innovation

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2020 5:08 am
by Nonc Hilaire
Good history lesson.

I think the author misses the point that the cost and limitations of evs are precisely why they are preferred over superior hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. Not much money in water and two electrodes.

Re: Research and Development; Invention and Innovation

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 12:11 am
by noddy
Colonel Sun wrote: Wed Aug 26, 2020 1:41 am ACM | Where Have All the Domestic Graduate Students Gone?

One of the better replies


118582851_10157148416375806_72050482142881883_n.jpg
high cost of living and debt based education - you would have to be mad to take on a risky degree in a field that the world only wants the best of the best.

Re: Research and Development; Invention and Innovation

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 5:41 pm
by Typhoon
noddy wrote: Tue Sep 15, 2020 12:11 am
Colonel Sun wrote: Wed Aug 26, 2020 1:41 am ACM | Where Have All the Domestic Graduate Students Gone?

One of the better replies


118582851_10157148416375806_72050482142881883_n.jpg
high cost of living and debt based education - you would have to be mad to take on a risky degree in a field that the world only wants the best of the best.
Debt-based education is certainly a factor.

What do you consider to be a "risky degree"?

Re: Research and Development; Invention and Innovation

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 5:49 pm
by Typhoon
Nonc Hilaire wrote: Mon Sep 14, 2020 5:08 am
Good history lesson.

I think the author misses the point that the cost and limitations of evs are precisely why they are preferred over superior hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. Not much money in water and two electrodes.
I have to disagree. The standard catalyst in hydrogen fuel cells is highly-expensive platinum. A great deal of recent work has been in finding alternative lower-cost catalysts such as carbon nanotubes.

The other problem with hydrogen is energy density, although is it less severe than energy storage via electric batteries.

energy_density.png
energy_density.png (107.56 KiB) Viewed 5912 times

Despite popular perception, hydrogen is safer than gasoline, as unlike gasoline it is lighter than air and vents away rather then accumulating.