Praying for your long life and prosperity.Typhoon wrote:(S)Nope.Nonc Hilaire wrote:I believe the director of the study when he says they brought in big garbage cans and destroyed data. That's a primary source.
Snopes isn't even a secondary source here. They never interviewed anybody, nor are they qualified to comment on research. They simply took CDC apologetics and repackaged them. This is a good example of why Snopes has such a poor reputation as an arbiter of truth.
Note to self. Given the ongoing issue with my immune system, make sure all of my vaccinations are up to date before my next trip to the USA.
1) Lancet & NEJM editors say we can no longer rely on published medical research. Most is corrupt or falsified.
2) Thompson, study director, publicly admits destroying data, reputations and careers. Publicly apologizes to Wakefield and his wife, destroying his own career.
3) Q.E.D, Thompson is credible as evidenced by acting against his own best interest.
4) Q.E.D, the CDC has proven to be an apologist and promoter of the vaccine industry.
I do not know the specifics of your own genetics and health issues, but I am concerned. We have never met, but you are an important person in my life. Each vaccine is different, and there are several sources for each. If you feel a vaccine is a worthy gamble, I suggest carefully reading the package insert and avoiding the human combinant version if possible. Non-human combinant versions of all vaccines exist, but one must ask.