Well the problem with the enforced health is the alternative is worseNapLajoieonSteroids wrote: ↑Sat Oct 02, 2021 8:43 amMy point (and what I read from the text) was that broadly, it's the only thing left to any of these governments. To what degree is where it differs.
At the same time we are in need of uniformity, and so we (and I mean we as in the US) have some bizarre tantrums to go with tv scolds...
...like I said the other day, unable to go about it communally.
============================
Even the sin taxes though are now immediately in the health category...no longer sins and not even culturally verboten either. We are free, as long as we understand that health is our obligation and shall be enforced come hell or highwater.
but for me, this is sort of compartmentalized with the pressing concern of a novel airborne virus.
The situation is between a rock and a hard place.
Corporates and governments rejecting coverage due to sinful lifestyles.
For now, i prefer the erring on the side of everyone gets treatment.