WSJ/NBC Poll: Almost Two-Thirds Back Attacking Militants
Public in More Hawkish Mood Ahead of President Obama's Speech to the Nation About Islamic State
By
Janet Hook and
Carol E. Lee
connect
Sept. 9, 2014 6:32 p.m. ET
President Barack Obama meets with Congressional leaders in the Oval Office of the White House on Tuesday to discuss options for combating the Islamic State. Associated Press
President Barack Obama will lay out plans on Wednesday to combat the militant group Islamic State to an American public that has grown increasingly hawkish.
Almost two-thirds of participants in a new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll believe it is in the nation's interest to confront the group, known as ISIS and as ISIL, which has swept through Syria and northern Iraq and recently beheaded two U.S. journalists. Only 13% saw no national interest in acting.
In addition, some 40% in those polled said any U.S. military action against ISIS should be limited to airstrikes and an additional 34% backed both airstrikes and committing U.S. ground troops to the battle—a remarkable mood swing for an electorate that just a year ago recoiled at Mr. Obama's proposal to launch airstrikes against Syria.
WSJ/NBC News Poll Results
See the latest results from the WSJ/NBC News poll here.
The survey also found indications that more people were coming to believe the U.S. should play a more active role on the world stage, a shift from Journal/NBC surveys earlier this year that found war-weary Americans wanting to step back from foreign engagements.
That suggests that Mr. Obama will be addressing an audience more open to supporting a military operation than at any point since he took office promising to end the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Mr. Obama aims to use the speech to clarify his goals for confronting ISIS, after weeks of mixed messages that have drawn sharp criticism from Republicans and from within his own Democratic Party. He heads into the moment in a position of weakness: The Journal/NBC poll found that approval of his handling of foreign policy has hit a new low of 32%, down from 36% a month earlier. By large margins, poll participants saw Republicans as better able than Democrats to ensure a strong national defense and conduct foreign policy.
The White House has elevated the significance of Mr. Obama's speech by making it a rare prime-time address to the nation, at 9 p.m. EDT. White House officials said the decision was intended to put Americans on alert, on the eve of the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, that the country faces a serious threat from the Islamic State.
"It means that the president believes this is a high national security priority," White House press secretary Josh Earnest said Tuesday.
Mr. Obama met with congressional leaders Tuesday to brief them on his strategy and to discuss ways to ensure that lawmakers are on board with his plan. White House officials said Mr. Obama wouldn't set a timetable for U.S. involvement in what they call the next, "more offensive" phase in the fight against the Islamic State—a phase that aides say could take years, well beyond Mr. Obama's time in office.
The formation of a new Iraqi government this week could pave the way for Mr. Obama to significantly expand U.S. airstrikes to target the logistics hubs and supply lines of the Islamic State, administration officials said. The president also could announce a decision on broadening the U.S. air campaign into Syria, the Islamic State's stronghold. In addition, the president is wrestling with whether to authorize a U.S. military operation to target individual leaders of the Islamic State.
In moving cautiously to date, Mr. Obama may have underestimated the public's appetite for military action—especially after the beheading of two American journalists.
The poll found that 61% saw it in the nation's interest to attack ISIS. Last year, after Mr. Obama accused the Syrian government of using chemical weapons, only 21% said it was in the U.S. interest to take military action.
The president has "a country and an electorate, regardless of party, who seems to be ready to take the next step," said Fred Yang, a Democratic pollster who conducted the survey with GOP pollster Bill McInturff. That could give Mr. Obama may have a chance to reassert himself as a leader, pollsters said.
"The president seems to be controlled by events and not leading events," said Mr. McInturff. But with the public so ready to take military action against ISIS, he said, "it might allow him to perhaps use September and October to be a more strongly perceived figure than he's been."
In recent months, domestic issues have been overshadowed by crises across the globe—especially the rapid advance of Islamic State in Iraq. Mr. Obama has launched airstrikes to protect U.S. interests but has been criticized for not acting more quickly and decisively—a critique fueled last week when he said, "We have no strategy yet."
Moreover, Mr. Obama has presided over a significant decline in confidence in U.S. security: The poll found that 47% believe the country is less safe than it was before the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks—up sharply from 28% just one year ago.
The survey was taken Sept. 3-7, just after the beheading by ISIS of a second U.S. journalist. While those surveyed weren't asked directly about that event, the poll found that 94% had heard news of the two murders, a higher level of public attention than given to any of 22 news events the Journal/NBC News survey has tested since 2009.
The news, in some cases, turned doves into hawks. "Come on! They are rounding up people and just killing them," said Sara Appleton, 31, a Democrat in Austin who opposed the Iraq war and voted twice for Mr. Obama. "I think we should have intervened earlier."
Some 27% of registered voters in the poll said the U.S. should be more active in world affairs—up substantially from the 19% in an April survey, but still a smaller share than the 40% who said the U.S. should be less active on the world stage.
Even among those who want a less active U.S. role, 43% said the U.S. has a national interest in responding to ISIS, compared with 25% who saw no national interest.
Mr. Obama, in his meeting Tuesday with congressional leaders, said he believes he doesn't need a vote from lawmakers to authorize the strategy he'll lay out Wednesday but supports action in Congress that would "aid the overall effort and demonstrate to the world that the United States is united in defeating'' ISIS, the White House said in a statement.
House Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio) said after the White House meeting, which lasted more than an hour, that he urged the president to set a goal of defeating and destroying ISIS, and to "define success in those terms" in his speech Wednesday. He told Mr. Obama he supported proposals to strengthen the Iraqi Security Forces and to train and equip the Syrian opposition.
He also told the president he would support the deployment of U.S. troops in a training and advisory role and to "assist with lethal targeting of ISIL leadership"
In other recent conversations leading up to his national address, Mr. Obama told foreign policy experts at a White House dinner Tuesday night that he intends to dismantle the Islamic State.
Strobe Talbott, a deputy secretary of State during the Clinton administration and now president of the Brookings Institution think tank, said he left the dinner with the sense that the president is convinced the U.S. and its allies need a comprehensive approach to destroy the extremist group.
"This is not a matter of containment," Mr. Talbott said. "This is not about keeping ISIS from expanding, it is about a takedown."
Mr. Obama's approach so far has fueled Republican complaints that he is too indecisive, even has he prepares in Wednesday's speech to take a more aggressive approach. "It's about three or four weeks too late," said Stephen Payton, 31, a Republican in Macon, Missouri.
However, Mr. Obama's more cautious style of foreign policy leadership has its fans, even in the face of the provocation of beheadings.
"Unceasing belligerence is what got us into trouble," said Paul Linxwiler, 51, a Memphis Democrat. "I'm glad to see someone who is way more reserved, cool and calculating
