https://pjmedia.com/trending/alternativ ... um=twitter
Alternative Start-Ups Cut Off from Financial Services in Overnight Political Purge by Stripe
Alternative Start-Ups Cut Off from Financial Services in Overnight Political Purge by Stripe
This is an interesting development.noddy wrote:youtube also blocked a popular open source software programs channel because they refused advertising - they very much are trying to commericalise.
https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments ... worldwide/
the recommend strategy which doesnt require massive startup funding is leveraging the infrastructure put in place by the open bitttorent network.
a new webs server package called peertube has been created to facilitate this.
Typhoon wrote:This is an interesting development.noddy wrote:youtube also blocked a popular open source software programs channel because they refused advertising - they very much are trying to commericalise.
https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments ... worldwide/
the recommend strategy which doesnt require massive startup funding is leveraging the infrastructure put in place by the open bitttorent network.
a new webs server package called peertube has been created to facilitate this.
‘THE GOOD CENSOR’: Leaked Google Briefing Admits Abandonment of Free Speech for ‘Safety And Civility’
The Good Censor - GOOGLE LEAK
Uploaded by Allum Bokhari
A leaked Google briefing in which the company admits a "shift towards censorship" in Silicon Valley.
While some tech companies are backing away from working with the Pentagon, Jeff Bezos says Amazon.com Inc. won’t be one of them.
“If big tech companies are going to turn their back on the Department of Defense, this country is going to be in trouble,” Bezos said.
Speaking in San Francisco at an event for Wired’s 25th anniversary Monday, Amazon’s chief executive said he was baffled that some companies have cut Pentagon ties after employee dissent.
“We are going to continue to support the DoD, and I think we should,” said Bezos. “One of the jobs of senior leadership is to make the right decision, even when it’s unpopular.”
....Uh-oh: Silicon Valley is building a Chinese-style social credit system
In China, scoring citizens’ behavior is official government policy. U.S. companies are increasingly doing something similar, outside the law.
The most disturbing attribute of a social credit system is not that it’s invasive, but that it’s extralegal. Crimes are punished outside the legal system, which means no presumption of innocence, no legal representation, no judge, no jury, and often no appeal. In other words, it’s an alternative legal system where the accused have fewer rights.
Social credit systems are an end-run around the pesky complications of the legal system. Unlike China’s government policy, the social credit system emerging in the U.S. is enforced by private companies. If the public objects to how these laws are enforced, it can’t elect new rule-makers.
An increasing number of societal “privileges” related to transportation, accommodations, communications, and the rates we pay for services (like insurance) are either controlled by technology companies or affected by how we use technology services. And Silicon Valley’s rules for being allowed to use their services are getting stricter.
If current trends hold, it’s possible that in the future a majority of misdemeanors and even some felonies will be punished not by Washington, D.C., but by Silicon Valley. It’s a slippery slope away from democracy and toward corporatocracy.
In other words, in the future, law enforcement may be determined less by the Constitution and legal code, and more by end-user license agreements.
It had to happen sooner or later. All those Asians, blacks, rednecks, deplorables, 99%ers, etc. (pick one) look the same to us (we?). So how else are you gonna tell them apart?Doc wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2019 10:53 pm https://www.fastcompany.com/90394048/uh ... dit-system
....Uh-oh: Silicon Valley is building a Chinese-style social credit system
In China, scoring citizens’ behavior is official government policy. U.S. companies are increasingly doing something similar, outside the law.
The most disturbing attribute of a social credit system is not that it’s invasive, but that it’s extralegal. Crimes are punished outside the legal system, which means no presumption of innocence, no legal representation, no judge, no jury, and often no appeal. In other words, it’s an alternative legal system where the accused have fewer rights.
Social credit systems are an end-run around the pesky complications of the legal system. Unlike China’s government policy, the social credit system emerging in the U.S. is enforced by private companies. If the public objects to how these laws are enforced, it can’t elect new rule-makers.
An increasing number of societal “privileges” related to transportation, accommodations, communications, and the rates we pay for services (like insurance) are either controlled by technology companies or affected by how we use technology services. And Silicon Valley’s rules for being allowed to use their services are getting stricter.
If current trends hold, it’s possible that in the future a majority of misdemeanors and even some felonies will be punished not by Washington, D.C., but by Silicon Valley. It’s a slippery slope away from democracy and toward corporatocracy.
In other words, in the future, law enforcement may be determined less by the Constitution and legal code, and more by end-user license agreements.
"Youtube is playing a game where I can't tell you what politicians say"Simple Minded wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2019 11:44 amIt had to happen sooner or later. All those Asians, blacks, rednecks, deplorables, 99%ers, etc. (pick one) look the same to us (we?). So how else are you gonna tell them apart?Doc wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2019 10:53 pm https://www.fastcompany.com/90394048/uh ... dit-system
....Uh-oh: Silicon Valley is building a Chinese-style social credit system
In China, scoring citizens’ behavior is official government policy. U.S. companies are increasingly doing something similar, outside the law.
The most disturbing attribute of a social credit system is not that it’s invasive, but that it’s extralegal. Crimes are punished outside the legal system, which means no presumption of innocence, no legal representation, no judge, no jury, and often no appeal. In other words, it’s an alternative legal system where the accused have fewer rights.
Social credit systems are an end-run around the pesky complications of the legal system. Unlike China’s government policy, the social credit system emerging in the U.S. is enforced by private companies. If the public objects to how these laws are enforced, it can’t elect new rule-makers.
An increasing number of societal “privileges” related to transportation, accommodations, communications, and the rates we pay for services (like insurance) are either controlled by technology companies or affected by how we use technology services. And Silicon Valley’s rules for being allowed to use their services are getting stricter.
If current trends hold, it’s possible that in the future a majority of misdemeanors and even some felonies will be punished not by Washington, D.C., but by Silicon Valley. It’s a slippery slope away from democracy and toward corporatocracy.
In other words, in the future, law enforcement may be determined less by the Constitution and legal code, and more by end-user license agreements.