Typhoon,Typhoon wrote: We have now reached the [low] point in the campaign..
Never say never.
Alex.
Typhoon,Typhoon wrote: We have now reached the [low] point in the campaign..
True. It could still turn from a figurative into a literal p*ssing contest.manolo wrote:Typhoon,Typhoon wrote: We have now reached the [low] point in the campaign..
Never say never.
Alex.
Old Jewish Redneck Zen saying: "there's always room for worse."Typhoon wrote:
We have now reached the [low] point in the campaign where it is time to update the WWII classic and make it the official song of the US primaries:
That's the problem in Merika today, real men, and proven methods of problem solving are frowned upon.......
Very true. I used to think it was difference of opinion. Now I think it is overt censorship. Biggest megaphone, most frequent broadcast shapes the argument. Possibly even "suggests" to the herd members who wish to be viewed as enlightened, what the "mainstream" opinion is or should be, and who/what should be viewed as "extreme."NapLajoieonSteroids wrote:
Right. However dull the point, it still chafes from all the rubbing. It's a 'where's my feet' moment when you walk through crowds of people everyday repeating and repeating and repeating the same word- then you start doing it; and there is no escape....
Simple Minded wrote:Old Jewish Redneck Zen saying: "there's always room for worse."Typhoon wrote:
We have now reached the [low] point in the campaign where it is time to update the WWII classic and make it the official song of the US primaries:
Back in 08 or so, James Carville suggested that Hilary give Obama a testicle, so that each of them could have two......
Makes one wonder how Maggie Thatcher got erected......
The older I get, the more I think that that cynical observation that "99% of what people believe in is bullsh*t" is accurate.Simple Minded wrote:Very true. I used to think it was difference of opinion. Now I think it is overt censorship. Biggest megaphone, most frequent broadcast shapes the argument. Possibly even "suggests" to the herd members who wish to be viewed as enlightened, what the "mainstream" opinion is or should be, and who/what should be viewed as "extreme."NapLajoieonSteroids wrote:
Right. However dull the point, it still chafes from all the rubbing. It's a 'where's my feet' moment when you walk through crowds of people everyday repeating and repeating and repeating the same word- then you start doing it; and there is no escape....
"You don't think that every non-constant aspect of weather that has been considered normal for eons is evidence of AGW/MMGW/climate change? You're a Flat Earther/Holocaust Denier!"
Life was easier for Big Brother back in the Walter Chronkite days......
Presumably your experts, alleged, are as capable of using Google as anyone else.Mr. Perfect wrote: . . .
Of interest to this forum, I own a significant interest in a data analytics firm, and have world class statisticians at my fingertips. Any question I have on the subject is answered by the by the brightest minds in the business at my whim. The dividends have paid off in ways that can't be measured in dollars alone. You guys can even try me, I can get any statistics question answered very rapidly. It's fantastic.
Possibly.YMix wrote:I think Mr. Perfect is busy caucusing for Drumpf.
Romney is a choke artist.Typhoon wrote:Possibly.YMix wrote:I think Mr. Perfect is busy caucusing for Drumpf.
Trumpy. The Saviour du jour.
Was not Romney the Saviour the last round? The guy who just called Trumpy batsh*t crazy.
Did you mean Trumpy?Brecher wrote:Boston Herald: Romney is wise to skip CPAC cuckfab
SM,Simple Minded wrote: We need to stop revering unarmed pussies!
there's a woman who deserves all the respect one would normally accord a man.....Typhoon wrote:
You have to ask?
Sometimes you can learn something even from a white guy.....Typhoon wrote:
*thanks to noddy, I have once again expanded my, er, vocabulary
Typhoon wrote:The older I get, the more I think that that cynical observation that "99% of what people believe in is bullsh*t" is accurate.Simple Minded wrote:Very true. I used to think it was difference of opinion. Now I think it is overt censorship. Biggest megaphone, most frequent broadcast shapes the argument. Possibly even "suggests" to the herd members who wish to be viewed as enlightened, what the "mainstream" opinion is or should be, and who/what should be viewed as "extreme."NapLajoieonSteroids wrote:
Right. However dull the point, it still chafes from all the rubbing. It's a 'where's my feet' moment when you walk through crowds of people everyday repeating and repeating and repeating the same word- then you start doing it; and there is no escape....
"You don't think that every non-constant aspect of weather that has been considered normal for eons is evidence of AGW/MMGW/climate change? You're a Flat Earther/Holocaust Denier!"
Life was easier for Big Brother back in the Walter Chronkite days......
Yes, of course. Thanks.Typhoon wrote:Did you mean Trumpy?Brecher wrote:Boston Herald: Romney is wise to skip CPAC cuckfab
And then it turned into a nation of idiots, incapable of doing anything except conduct military operations against primitive countries. The objective performance of the latter Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama administrations, and the Gingrich, Reid-Pelosi, and Boehner-led congresses, and most of the courts, have for these 25 years been shameful and as unprecedented in American history as the swift rise of America was in the history of the world. The people turned out rascals and got worse rascals.
Americans, Trump rightly concluded, could not abide a continuation in office of those in both parties who had given them decades of shabby and incompetent government: stagnant family incomes, the worst recession in 80 years, stupid wars that cost scores of thousands of casualties and trillions of dollars and generated a humanitarian disaster, serial foreign policy humiliations, and particularly the absence of a border to prevent the entry of unlimited numbers of unskilled migrants, and trade deals that seemed only to import unemployment with often defective goods. I was one of those who thought at the outset that Trump was giving it a shot, and that if it didn’t fly it would at least be a good brand-building exercise.
HP,
There is no anti-Trump majority to consolidate.
There is an anti-establishment majority.
And the only question has been which candidate, if any, will consolidate it.
SM,Simple Minded wrote:
Hillary Clinton was, as Trump described her when she unwisely accused him of being a sexist, a facilitator of sexism; simultaneously the feminist in chief and First (Wronged) Lady, as spouse of America’s premier sexist. She was elected in a rotten borough for the Democrats in New York State, and was a nondescript secretary of state. She has been caught in innumerable falsehoods and her conduct in the entire Benghazi affair (the terrorist murder of a U.S. ambassador) was reprehensible. Her indictment for various breaches of national security and possible perjury is regularly demanded by former attorney general Michael Mukasey and other worthies.
She is often impressive..." ??????