Zack Morris wrote:
Because I'm smart.
No. You are not smart. At all.
No.
"I don't know" is the only honest answer. Because you have no earthly idea.
If you want to explore uncharted scientific territory, it often helps to know where people have been and where they're trying to move forward.
Cool story bro. But you have no idea how DNA could originate. And you and I both know it's impossible abiotically.
Tell that to the scientific journal that published my work.
I will. Give me their contact information.
Abiogenesis itself is a thoroughly scientific idea
No. It is not. It is impossible.
even if the exact mechanism remains unknown
The inexact mechanisms are also unknown. Everything about it is unknown.
because there is evidence that life at one point did not exist and then later, it suddenly did.
Lol. So what. Have you heard of a tautology.
Virtually all of our scientific understanding confirms or is based around the observable fact that complex phenomena and structures arise from basic interactions between particles.
Lol all of our understanding confirms that there are severe limits on structures that arise from chemical processes. Eg, the random creation of DNA is as impossible as a duck reproducing with a goat. You have no science whatsoever.
Nothing suggests organic molecules and living organisms can somehow be compartmentalized away from this.
Everything suggests the random generation of DNA is impossible.
On the other hand, there is zero evidence for life -- or anything in this world -- arising from a nonphysical process.
There is zero evidence that DNA came from a random spontaneous process. You have such a huge problem on your hands.
It is a testable hypothesis and like it or not, every other observable process is itself a form of evidence, however weak or indirect, for it until either a more detailed understanding is achieved or a counterexample can be demonstrated.
Lol absolutely not. T here is no science whatsoever supporting abiotic genesis of DNA.
Your argument is akin to claiming that fusion cannot possibly be happening in the sun because we cannot demonstrate self-sustaining fusion reactions here on Earth nor have we fully inspected the core of the sun.
No, that is not my argument at all. My argument is since Na meeting Cl cannot form lead, DNA cannot spontaneously generate. Anyone studying the issue for 5 minutes will come to the same conclusion.
I'm sure the Koran will outlast me, too. Muslims will probably out-reproduce your descendants
Probably not.
I think most of us here agree you don't understand the science behind any of what you write.
Lol what I'm getting is several pages of blubbering because you couldn't even get your cord to ignite let alone get anything to launch, and I appear to be the only one who knows what science even is.